Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny

Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2022)

Teologia duchowości

Reflecting on Conversion: Are Social Sciences Taking the Place of Theology?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34839/wpt.2022.30.1.119-137  [Google Scholar]
Publicado: 2022-07-26

Resumen

Conversion has been of major interest to psychology and sociology. In contemporary psychology of religion and spirituality, it is viewed as a particular case of spiritual transformation. Down through the centuries, theology has seen conversion as the fruit of collaboration between human endeavor and God’s grace. This dimension of conversion has not been the subject of psychological research. Nonetheless, the scientific findings regarding conversion may help us better understand human nature’s interaction with Divine grace. This paper will present the history of conversion and selected theories and conceptualizations of conversion originating in human sciences which can be helpful in understanding human experiences around religious conversion.

Citas

  1. Baggett J.P., Protagoras’s Assertion Revisited: American Atheism and its Accompanying Obscurities, “Implicit Religion” 14/3 (2011), pp. 257–294. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbour J.D., Versions of Deconversion: Autobiography and the Loss of Faith, Charlottesville 1994. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beit-Hallahmi B., Conversion, [in:] Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, D.A. Leeming, K. Madden, S. Marlan (eds.), New York 2020, pp. 507–510. [Google Scholar]
  4. Catechism of the Catholic Church, London 1999. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dein S., Cook C.C.H., Koenig H.G., Religion, Spirituality, and Mental Health: Current Controversies and Future Directions, “Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease” 200 (2012), pp. 852–855. [Google Scholar]
  6. Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, D.A. Leeming, K. Madden, S. Marlan (eds.), New York 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Everson K.K.C., Becoming Religious Disbelievers: Retrospective Viewpoints, “Pastoral Psychology” 68/3 (2019), pp. 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gooren H., Reassessing Conventional Approaches to Conversion: Toward a New Synthesis, “Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 46/3 (2007), pp. 337–353. [Google Scholar]
  9. Halama P., Empirical Approach to Typology of Religious Conversion, “Pastoral Psychology” 64/2 (2015), pp. 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  10. Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (eds.), New York 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill P.C., Measurement assessment and issues in the psychology of religion and spirituality, [in:] Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (eds.), New York 2013, pp. 48–74. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hood R.W. Jr., The History and Current State of Research on Psychology of Religion, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Spirituality and Psychology, L. Miller (ed.), New York 2012, pp. 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  13. Iyadurai J., Religious Conversion and Personal Transformation, [in:] Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, D.A. Leeming, K. Madden, S. Marlan (eds.), New York 2020, pp. 1992–1994. [Google Scholar]
  14. James W., The Varieties of Religious Experiences, New York 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jastrzębski A.K., Concepts of Spirituality at Universities of Today, “Roczniki Teologiczne” 66/5 (2019), pp. 99–113. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jastrzębski A.K., Recent Developments in Understanding Spirituality as Exemplified by the Concept of Self-Transcendence, “Verbum Vitae” 39/2(2021), pp. 513–523. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jastrzębski A.K., The Normative Aspect in the Contemporary Understanding of Spirituality, “Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny” 28/2 (2020), pp. 95–111. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jindra I.W., Religious Stage Development among Converts to Different Religious, “The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion” 18 (2008), pp. 195–215. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kozielecki J., Z Bogiem albo bez Boga. Psychologia religii: nowe spojrzenie [With God or Without God. Psychology of Religion: A New Perspective], Warszawa 1991. [Google Scholar]
  20. Leksykon duchowości katolickiej [Lexicon of Catholic Spirituality], Chmielewski M. (red.), Lublin–Kraków 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lofland J., Skonovd N., Conversion motifs, “Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 20/4 (1981), pp. 373–385. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahoney A., Pargament K.I., Sacred Changes: Spiritual Conversion and Transformation, “Journal of Clinical Psychology” 60/5 (2004), pp. 481–492. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oman D., Defining Religion and Spirituality, [in:] Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (eds.), New York 2013, pp. 23–47. [Google Scholar]
  24. Paloutzian R.F., Murken S., Streib H., Röβler-Namini S., Conversion, Deconversion, and Spiritual Transformation: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary View, [in:] Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, R.F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park (eds.), New York 2013, pp. 399–421. [Google Scholar]
  25. Paloutzian R.F., Richardson J.T., Rambo L.R., Religious Conversion and Personality Change, “Journal of Personality” 67/6 (1999), pp. 1047–1079. [Google Scholar]
  26. Park C.L., Sherman A.C., Jim H.S.L., Salsman J.M., Religion/Spirituality and Health in the Context of Cancer: Cross‐Domain Integration, Unresolved Issues, and Future Directions, “Cancer” 121/21 (2015), pp. 3789–3794. [Google Scholar]
  27. Perrin D., Studying Christian Spirituality, New York 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Psychoanaliza i religia w XXI wieku. Współzawodnictwo czy współpraca? [Psychoanalysis and Religion in the 21st Century: Competition or Cooperation?], D.M. Black (red.), tłum. A. Skórzak, Kraków 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rambo L.R., Understanding Religious Conversion, New Haven 1993. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rambo L.R., Theories of Conversion: Understanding and Interpreting Religious Change, “Social Compass” 46/3 (1999), pp. 259–271. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rambo L.R., Bauman S.C., Psychology of Conversion and Spiritual Transformation, “Pastoral Psychology” 61/5–6 (2011), pp. 879–894. [Google Scholar]
  32. Richardson J.T., The Active vs. Passive Convert: Paradigm Conflict in Conversion/Recruitment Research, “Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 24/2 (1985), pp. 163–179. [Google Scholar]
  33. Silver C.F., Coleman T.J., Hood R.W. Jr, Holcombe J.M., The Six Types of Nonbelief: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Type and Narrative, “Mental Health, Religion and Culture” 17/10 (2014), pp. 990–1001. [Google Scholar]
  34. Snook D.W., Williams M.J., Horgan J.G., Issues in the Sociology and Psychology of Religious Conversion, “Pastoral Psychology” 68/2 (2019), pp. 223–240. [Google Scholar]
  35. Snow D.A., Machalek R., The Convert as a Social Type, “Sociological Theory” 1 (1983), pp. 259–289. [Google Scholar]
  36. Streib H., Hood R.W. Jr., Keller B., Csöff R-M., Silver C., Deconversion: Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States, Göttingen 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Streib H., Keller B., The Variety of Deconversion Experiences: Contours of a Concept in Respect to Empirical Research, “Archive for the Psychology of Religion” 26 (2004), pp. 181–200. [Google Scholar]
  38. Taves A., Psychology of Religion Approaches to the Study of Religious Experience, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience, P.K. Moser, C. Meister (eds.), Cambridge 2020, pp. 25–54. [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor L.A., Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Religious Conversion, “Pastoral Psychology” 70/1 (2021), pp. 33–51. [Google Scholar]
  40. The Cambridge Companion to Religious Experience, P.K. Moser, C. Meister (eds.), Cambridge 2020. [Google Scholar]
  41. The Oxford Handbook of Spirituality and Psychology, L. Miller (ed.), New York 2012. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zinnbauer B.J., Pargament K.I., Spiritual Conversion: A Study of Religious Change among College Students, “Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 37/1 (1998), pp. 161–180. [Google Scholar]

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.