Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito

V. 20 N. 22 (1) (2025)

Artykuły

Change in the Constitutional Role of the Parliament of Ukraine as a Result of Ukraine’s Accession to the European Union

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/bsawp.9623  [Google Scholar]
Pubblicato: 2025-05-16

Abstract

The article is aimed at exploring the transformation that the Parliament of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU) should undergo as a result of Ukraine’s integration into the European Union. In particular, the article focuses on the constitutional functions and powers of the VRU as national parliament of an EU member state. By analysing the role that National Parliaments play in the EU legal system, the study analyses changes to be introduced to the VRU’s legislative, scrutinizing and representative functions. The role of the national parliament is undoubtedly defined in the constitution. The article therefore presents an overview of the constitutional provisions of a number of EU member states in order to determine what changes should be introduced to the Constitution of Ukraine. Finally, the overview of possible amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine are discussed in the context of parliamentary control and legislative activity.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Algash, Valentyna, and Anna Pittel. 2019. “Suchasna mihratsiina kryza yak vyklyk dlia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu.” Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo no. 12:334-38. [Google Scholar]
  2. Auel, Katrin, and Christine Neuhold. 2016. “Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty.” Journal of European Public Policy 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barabash, Alla, and Yuliia Hubar. 2021. “Mizhnarodni uhody yak dzherelo mizhnarodnoho pryvatnoho prava.” In Pravovi ta sotsialʹno-ekonomichni aspekty stratehichnoho rozvytku rehionu ta terytorialʹnykh hromad, edited by Mykola Murashko, 566. Chernihiv: Chernihiv Institute Named After the Heroes of Kruty, MAUP [Google Scholar]
  4. Bidonko, Khrystyna. 2024. “The Role of the Parliament in European Integration: Croatia’s Lessons for Ukraine.” Copernican Journal of Law 1:17-38. https://doi.org/10.71042/CJL01202402 [Google Scholar]
  5. Borońska-Hryniewiecka, Karolina. 2017. “From the Early Warning System to a ‘Green Card’ for National Parliaments: Hindering or Accelerating EU Policy-making?” In National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation?, edited by Davor Jančić, 247-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulana, Yevhenia. 2021. “Dii Europejskoho Sojuzu na pochatkovomu etapi koronakryzy.” Travnevi studii 2021: istoria, miznarodni vidnosyny, filosofija 201-204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frieden, Jeffry, and Stefanie Walter. 2017. “Understanding the Political Economy of the Eurozone Crisis.” Annual Review of Political Science 20:371-90. [Google Scholar]
  8. Grøn, Caroline H., and Anders Wivel. 2011. “Maximizing Influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From Small State Policy to Smart State Strategy.” Journal of European Integration 33, no. 5:523-39. [Google Scholar]
  9. Heidbreder, Eva G. 2022. “Federalism in the European Union.” In Emerging Federal Structures in the Post-Cold War Era, edited by Soeren Keil, and Sabine Kropp, 277-99. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jančić, Davor. 2017. “The Legacy of an Evolving Polity: Democracy, National Identity, and the Good Functioning of the EU.” In National Parliaments After the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation?, edited by Davor Jančić, 1-24. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalaitzaki, Katerina. 2025. “The Role of National Parliaments and European Parliament as Guardians of European Values: The Case of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Cyprus.” The Journal of Legislative Studies no. 1:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2024.2443882 [Google Scholar]
  12. Krõõt Tupay, Paloma. 2023. “Estonian Constitutional Court: EU-conformity as a supra-legal goal.” https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2023-posts/2023/11/9/estonian-constitutional-court-eu-conformity-as-a-supra-legal-goal [accessed: 01.03.2025]. [Google Scholar]
  13. Laursen, Finn. 2012. “The Lisbon Treaty: How Significant?” In The EU’s Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation, edited by Finn Laursen, 285-93. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Perepiolkin, Serhii, Andrii Samotuha, and Liudmyla Filianina. 2016. Konspekt lektsii z dystsypliny «Pravo Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu». Dnipro: Dnipropetrovskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutional Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 2:126-63. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rizzuto, Francesco. 2004. “European Integration and the French Parliament: From Ineffectual Watchdog to Constitutional Rehabilitation and an Enhanced Political Role.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 10, no. 1:123-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000318909 [Google Scholar]
  17. Savkova, Mariela. 2023. “The Next Stage of Federalization of the European Union.” Journal of Management Policy and Practice 24, no. 3:59-71. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilde de, Pieter, and Tapio Raunio. 2018. “Redirecting National Parliaments: Setting Priorities for Involvement in EU Affairs.” Comparative European Politics 16:310-29. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.28 [Google Scholar]
  19. Winzen, Thomas. 2021. “The Institutional Position of National Parliaments in the European Union: Developments, Explanations, Effects.” Journal of European Public Policy 29, no. 6:994-1008. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Articoli simili

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.