Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

E-justice in Poland – Polish Experiences

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.5288  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-06-30

Abstract

In his research article, “E-justice in Poland: Polish experience,” the author discusses a relatively important subject that members of the society are likely to face, namely the use of modern Internet technologies and electronic devices in courts. At the outset, the author advances a thesis that today’s societies around the world are no longer able to go without the Internet, social networks, electronic documents, and electronic means of remote communication. This is how people do business and maintain contact today. Technology has become embedded in our civilisation as its natural component. This is no different in the court room where modern communication tools serve citizens. The author looks at the technological solutions through the Polish experience, but also through the European experience, in particular CEPEJ operating under the Council of Europe. The author also addresses the important issue of artificial intelligence and indicates areas in the judicial system where it could be applied effectively. The article aims to stimulate a global discussion on e-justice.

References

  1. Allen, John C. 2020. Artificial Intelligence in Our Legal System. Chicago: American Bar Association, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2020/winter/artificial-intelligence-our-legal-system/ [accessed: 09.12.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bieluk, Jerzy, and Andrzej Marciniak. 2016. Postępowanie i prawo cywilne w dobie informatyzacji. Sopot: Currenda. Lex el. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bues, Micha-Manuel, and Emilio Matthaei. 2017. “«Legal Tech on the Rise: Technology Changes Legal Work Behaviours, But Does Not Replace Its Profession». Management for Professionals.” In Liquid Legal, edited by Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler, and Roger Strathausen, 89-109. Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45868-7_7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bundin, Mikhail, Aleksei Martynov; Yakub Aliev, et al. 2018. “Legal Aspects of the Use of AI in Public Sector.” In Digital Transformation and Global Society. Third International Conference, 171-80. DTGS, St. Petersburg, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_14 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chłopecki, Aleksander. 2021. Sztuczna inteligencja – szkice prawnicze i futurologiczne. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dervanović, Dena. 2018. “«I, Inhuman Lawyer: Developing Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession». Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation.” In Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, edited by Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick, and Nikolaus Forgó, 209-34. Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dymitruk, Maria. 2020. “Sztuczna inteligencja w wymiarze sprawiedliwości?” In Prawo sztucznej inteligencji, edited by Luigi Lai, and Marek Świerczyński, 275-88. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Kinga. 2019. “Zastosowanie sztucznej inteligencji w pozasądowym rozwiązywaniu sporów cywilnych.” Studia Prawnicze KUL 3:91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.8896 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodman, Bryce, and Seth Flaxman, Seth 2017. “European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a “Right to Explanation”.” AI Magazine 38, no. 3:50-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goździaszek, Łukasz. 2015. “Perspektywy wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji w postępowaniu sądowym.” Przegląd Sądowy 10:46-60. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurkaynak, Gonenc, Ilay Yilmaz, and Gunes Haksever. 2016. “Stifling artificial intelligence: Human perils.” Computer Law & Security Review vol. 32, 749-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kościółek, Anna. 2019. “Wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji w sądowym postępowaniu cywilnym – zagadnienia wybrane.” In Sztuczna inteligencja, blockchain, cyberbezpieczeństwo oraz dane osobowe. Zagadnienia wybrane, edited by Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Jacek Gołaczyński, and Dariusz Szostek, 67-74. Warszawa: C.H. Beck. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lynn, Bryan. 2020. “Robot Justice: The Rise of China’s ‘Internet Courts’.” Voan News, https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/robot-justice-the-rise-of-china-s-internetcourts-/5201677.html [accessed: 09.12.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  14. Martsenko, Nataliia. 2020. “Determining the place of artificial intelligence in civil law.” Studia Prawnoustrojowe 3:157-73. [Google Scholar]
  15. Niiler, Eric. 2019. “Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So.” https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/ [accessed: 09.12.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Płocha, Ewa. 2020. “O pojęciu sztucznej inteligencji i możliwościach jej zastosowania w postępowaniu cywilnym.” Prawo w Działaniu 44:273-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32041/PWD.4414 [Google Scholar]
  17. Reiling, Dory. 2009. Technology for Justice. How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform. Leiden: Leiden University Press and Amsterdam University Press Law, Governance and Development Dissertation Series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789087280710 [Google Scholar]
  18. Zagórna, Anna. 2019. “Proszę wstać, algorytm idzie.” https://www.sztucznainteligencja.org.pl/prosze-wstac-algorytm-idzie/ [accessed: 09.12.2021]. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.