Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 19 No. 21 (2) (2024)

Articles

Protection of Critical Satellite Infrastructure and its Importance for Global Security. Selected Aspects

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/bsawp.8532  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-11-13

Abstract

In July 2018, at a meeting in Brussels, NATO leaders agreed that space was a dynamic and rapidly developing area of considerable importance to the Alliance’s joint deterrence and defense posture. They then decided to develop an overarching NATO space policy, which was done less than a year later. In December 2019, space was recognized as a new operational domain (alongside air, land, sea and cyberspace). There was immediate speculation that this surge in NATO space activity was triggered by President Donald Trump’s initiative to create the United States Space Force (USSF). In fact, however, these were deliberate decisions by the Allies preceded by years of meticulous research and discussions.

In terms of security, however, space is not “new,” as it has remained closely linked primarily to nuclear deterrence since the beginning of the Cold War. Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) technology was essential to both the nuclear and space races. Space thus became the arena in which the rivalry between the Soviet Union and the United States was at its most spectacular, and extremely peaceful.

References

  1. Eagleson, David. 2023. „Ochrona naszej krytycznej infrastruktury satelitarnej – znaczenie infrastruktury kosmicznej dla ludzkości i jej status w NATO.” NATO Review (24.10.2023), https://www.nato.int/docu/review/pl/articles/2023/10/24/ochrona-naszej-krytycznej-infrastruktury-satelitarnej-znaczenie-infrastruktury-kosmicznej-dla-ludzkosci-i-jej-status-w-nato/index.html [dostęp: 04.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fettweis, Christopher J. 2022. „Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself: The National Security Policy of the United States.” W The Palgrave Handbook of National Security, red. Michael Clarke, Adam Henschke, Matthew Sussex, i in., 95-116. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kayser, Valérie. 2004. Launching Space Objects: Issues of Liability and Future Prospects. New York–Boston–Dordrecht–London–Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  4. Listner, Michael, i Rajeswari Pillau Rajagopalan. 2014. „The 2014 PPWT: a new draft but with the same and fifferennt problems.” https://thespacereview.com/article/2575/1 [dostęp: 04.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lueschow, Holger, i Roberto Pelaez. 2020. „Satelite Communication for Security and Defense.” W Handbook of Space Security: Policies, Applications and Programs, edited by Kai-Uwe Schrogl, 779-96. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  6. Paulauskas, Kestutis. 2020. „Space: NATO’s latest frontier.” NATO Review (18.03.2020), https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2020/03/18/space-natos-latest-frontier/index.html [dostęp: 04.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sussex, Matthew, i Michael Clarke. 2022. „Nuclear Weapons and National Security: From the Cold War to the “Second Nuclear Age” and Beyond.” W The Palgrave Handbook of National Security, red. Michael Clarke, Adam Henschke, Matthew Sussex, i in., 287-327. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.