
The aim of the commentary is to evaluate the Supreme Administrative Court’s judgment of 10 March 2021, III FSK 2552/21, with particular emphasis on the principle of trust. The main problem of this judgment is the scope of the power of attorney in tax proceedings: does it also cover appeal proceedings without an explicit statement to this effect? Doubts related to the understanding of a „tax case” as well as practical problems with the use of the PPS-1 form are also discussed. The current case law is discussed and legislative materials are presented. The conclusions include postulates of legislative amendments.
Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.