Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Problemy Współczesnej Kryminalistyki

Tom 26 (2022)

Artykuły

Rola sztucznej inteligencji w wykrywaniu i ściganiu przestępstw: stan obecny i perspektywy

  • Jurgita Baltrūnienė
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/pwk.5431  [Google Scholar]
Opublikowane: 2023-04-25

Abstrakt

The article analyses an area that has not yet received sufficient scientific attention: the useof artificial intelligence in the investigation of criminal offences. Artificial Intelligence (AI) isa widely discussed topic with rapidly developing technologies that will undoubtedly occupy an important place in criminal investigation and law enforcement activities. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving group of technologies. These technologies can provide economic and social benefits in a wide variety of industries and social activities. AI systems are widely used in the interactive world, search engines, digital assistants, computer game development, and security systems, as well as by law enforcement authorities and their techniques. In law enforcement authorities, AI systems are applied in process automation (document analysis, automatically generated messages, etc.), vehicles (automatic license plate scanning, recording of violations), facial recognition systems (in airports, when crossing the state border), robots (automatic demining robots) and internet technologies. Currently, significant investments and resources are being allocated in Lithuania and worldwide in order to improve AI algorithms and usage possibilities1 in both law enforcement authorities and ordinary people’s lives.

Bibliografia

  1. Literature [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainhoa Ruiz B., Akkerman M., Brunet P., A Walled World: Towards a Global Apartheid, Report, Transnational Institute, 18 November 2020, https://www.tni.org/en/walledworld (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. Čivilis E. et al., Lithuanian Artificial Intelligence Strategy. A Vision of the Future, Ministry of Economy and Innovation, 8 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Colson E., What AI-driven decision making looks like, „Harvard Business Review”, 8 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowford K., Time to regulate AI that interprets human emotions, „Nature”, 6 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Danišauskas G., Teisėsaugos funkcijų vykdančių institucijų rūšys bei teismo vieta šių institucijų sistemoje (Types of authorities carrying out law enforcement functions and the place of the court in the system of these authorities), „Socialnių Mokslų Studijos”/„Social Science Studies” 2009, No. 3(3). [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies M., Croall H., Tyrer J., An Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd, Boston 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. González Fuster G., Artificial Intelligence and Law Enforcement: Impact on Fundamental Rights, European Parliament ThinkTank, 7 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. How Artificial Intelligence in Policing Helps Crime Detection, INNEFU, 1 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jenkins R., Purves D., Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing: A Roadmap forResearch, Ethics+Emerging Sciences Group, 30 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. „Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE)” IOSR, 31 May 2015 (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuconis P., Nekrošius V., Teisėsaugos institucijos (Law Enforcement Authorities), Justitia, Vilnius 2001. [Google Scholar]
  13. Leese M., Predictive policing: Proceed, but with care, „Policy Perspectives”, 6 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Murauskas D., Dirbtinio intelekto metodai teisės taikymo srityje – galimybes varžo etiniai klausimai (Artificial Intelligence methods in the field of application of the law – opportunities limited by ethical issues), „Spektrum” (Vilnius University), 11 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raso F.A., Hilligoss H., Krishnamurthy V., Bavitz Ch., Kim L., Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks, Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, Research Publication No. 2018-6, 25 November 2018 (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. Rigano Ch., Using Artificial Intelligence to address criminal justice needs, „National Institute of Justice Journal”, 17 January 2019, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/252038.pdf (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  17. Rudin C., Predictive policing: Using machine learning to detect patterns of crime, „Wired”, 2 July 2021, https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/08/predictive-policing-using-machine-learning-to-detect-patterns-of-crime/ (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  18. Scott J.C., Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven 2008. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shachar A., Borders in the time of COVID-19, „Ethics and International Affairs”, 8 March 2020 https://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/2020/borders-in-the-time-of-covid-19/ (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  20. Tegmark M., Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Penguin Books, London 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Todorov A., Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Visockas E., Pasitikėjimas teisėsaugos institucijomis Lietuvoje (Trust in law enforcement authorities in Lithuania), „Teisės problemos” 2016, No. 2(2). [Google Scholar]
  23. Wada M., Ge Z.Y., Gilmore S.J., Mar V.J., Use of artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnosis and management, „The Medical Journal of Australia” 2020, No. 213(6). [Google Scholar]
  24. What is Artificial Intelligence and how is it used?, „European Parliament News”, 29 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zolberg A.R., Managing a world on the move, „Population and Development Review”,15 July 2006, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20058950 (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  26. Sources of law [Google Scholar]
  27. Council Common Position 2005/69/JHA of 24 January 2005 on exchanging certain data with Interpol (OJ L 27, 29 January 2005, p. 61). [Google Scholar]
  28. Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (OJ L 205, 07 August 2007, p. 63). [Google Scholar]
  29. Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18 July 2002, p.1). [Google Scholar]
  30. Council of the European Union, The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Context of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation, 21 October 2020 (accessed 1.03.2022). [Google Scholar]
  31. Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. [Google Scholar]
  32. ENISA Annual Threat Landscape Report, 27 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. European Parliament resolution of 6 October 2021 on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters [2020/2016(INI)]. [Google Scholar]
  34. European Commission, Definition of AI developed by the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence at the European Commission, 7 December 2018, 795 final. [Google Scholar]
  35. European Parliament resolution of 6 October 2021 on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters [2020/2016(INI]. [Google Scholar]
  36. European Commission, Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the shaping of the European approach to artificial intelligence, EUR-Lex, 25 April 2018, 237 final. [Google Scholar]
  37. European Commission, Feasibility Study on a Forecasting and Early Warning Tool for Migration Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology, Publications Office of the European Union, ECORYS, 15 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  38. Joint Opinion 5/2021 of the European Data Protection Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). [Google Scholar]
  39. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules of Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. [Google Scholar]
  40. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (see Official Journal p. 1). [Google Scholar]
  41. Resolution “On the Approval of the Description of the Procedure of Establishment of the Form, Size and Placement of the State Border Signs Marking the Border of the Republic of Lithuania on Land and in the Border Waters”, Government of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette „Valstybės žinios”, 21 March 2007, No 44-16. [Google Scholar]