Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 21 (2017)

Artykuły

Forensic linguistics in English-speaking countries

  • Martyna Grądziel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/pwk.5514  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-06-06

Abstract

Forensic linguistics has been practiced as a discipline of forensic science for decades, however, many authors still describe it as a new domain. The lack of interest in possibilities provided by linguistic analysis, not only in the process of identification
of an unknown author of a text (linguistic profiling) but also in the process of proving a person guilty, for example, by means of ascribing authorship to a person orestablishing of the intentions of the author of a text, has been especially clear in Poland.
The article focuses on the functioning of forensic linguistics in English speaking countries because in these countries the discipline is developing faster than anywhere else. It presents a short description of the main scope of application of linguistic analysis in the process of administration of justice and discusses the linguistic research methods which are applied the most frequently in this area, providing examples ofpractical application of specific types of analysis. 

References

  1. Coulthard M., Johnson A., An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics. Language in Evidence, Routledge, Abingdon–New York 2007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coulthard M., Johnson A., The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, Routledge, New York 2013 [Google Scholar]
  3. Feluś A., Z zagadnień językoznawstwa kryminalistycznego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe WSPiA im. Mieszka I w Poznaniu, Poznań 2011 [Google Scholar]
  4. Grant T., Authorship Attribution in a Forensic Context, University of Birmingham, listopad 2004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hołyst B., Psychologia kryminalistyczna, LexisNexis, Warszawa 2009, wydanie 3, r. LXXVII [Google Scholar]
  6. McMenamin G., Forensic Linguistics. Advances in Forensic Stylistics, CRC Press, Boca Raton 2002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Olsson J., Forensic Linguistics: Second Edition, Continuum International Publishing Group, London–New York 2008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Olsson J., Word Crime. Solving Crime through Forensic Linguistics, Bloomsbury Academic, London 2009 [Google Scholar]
  9. Olszewska M., Anonim jako ślad kryminalistyczny, „Prokuratura i Prawo” 2014, nr 11–12 [Google Scholar]
  10. Polański K., Encyklopedia językoznawstwa ogólnego, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 1999 [Google Scholar]
  11. Stawnicka J., Biegły językoznawca, czy lingwista kryminalistyczny, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Stawnicka J., Językoznawstwo w służbie wymiaru sprawiedliwości, „Kwartalnik Policyjny” 2015, nr 2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Tiersma P., Solan L., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wright D., Stylistics versus Statistics: A corpus linguistic approach to combining techniques in forensic authorship analysis using Enron emails, The University of Leeds School of English, wrzesień 2014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Zaśko-Zielińska M., Listy pożegnalne. W poszukiwaniu lingwistycznych wyznaczników autentyczności tekstu, Wydawnictwo Quaestio, Wrocław 2013. [Google Scholar]