Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Problemy Współczesnej Kryminalistyki

Vol. 21 (2017)

Artykuły

Criminalistics and criminology : equalities, functions, differences, methodologies

  • Jozef Metenko
  • Ludvik Juricek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/pwk.5519  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-06-06

Abstract

Although criminology is the discipline with the longest tradition in crime research, its history has had little to say about the place of scientific methods of crime evaluation, phenomenology and etiology. Criminalistics is oriented on evaluation and search of traces associated with a criminal act. Studies that have analyzed the history of scientific practices of criminal investigation have not come from the history of criminology. The history of criminology has analyzed neither the details of the scientific basis of the techniques nor whether they have actually worked. Such research has always come from the “sister” discipline: criminalistics, which can be defined as the science behind the recognition, collection, identification, and interpretation of traces and physical evidence, and the application of the natural sciences to legal science matters. This study is the partial result of the project implementation: “Centre of Excellence security research” (code ITMS: 26240120034 supported by the Research & Development Operational Programme funded by the ERDF). 

References

  1. Bacik, R. (2007). Kriminalisticke moznosti skumania pamatovych stop. Rigorozna praca. Bratislava: Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barta, M. (2008). Nedostatky vyskytujúce sa pri realizácii ohliadky miesta činu. Kriminalistika. Seminarna praca. Nepublikovane. Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke, R.V. & Eck, J. E. (2005). Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 steps. Retrieved from: www.popcenter.org/learning/60Steps/ [Google Scholar]
  4. Fabian, S. (2009). Criminalistics tactics: Methods and techniques of criminal investigation in Slovakia. British Columbia Institute of Technology, Centre for Forensics & Security Technology Studies, Crime & Intelligence Analysis. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher, B.A.J. (2004). Techniques of crime scene investigation, 7th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaspar, R. (2006). Procesne ukony a kriminalisticko-takticke metody. Rigorozna praca. Bratislava: Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  7. Geberth, V.J. (2006). Practical homicide investigation: Tactics, procedures, and forensic techniques, 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hencovska, M. (1993). World Factbook of Criminal Justice System. Faculty of Law. Pavol Jozef Safarik University. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hrasko, J. (1998). K niektorym problemom o uplatnovani domovej prehliadky v policajnej praxi. Kriminalisticke dni na Slovensku. Zbornik materialov z vedeckej konferencie konanej dna 20.-21.5.1998, pp.123-129. [Google Scholar]
  10. Konrad. Z. (2007). Metodika vysetrovani jednotlivych druhu trestnych cinu – cast kriminalisticke vedy?. Zbornik vedeckych a odbornych prac z medzinarodneho teoreticko-praktickeho seminara zo dna 23. 2. 2007, pp. 35-39. Bratislava: Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  11. Krajnik, V. (1998). Kriminalisticka identifikacia v kriminalistickej taktike. Kriminalisticke dni na Slovensku. Zbornik materialov z vedeckej konferencie konanej dna 20.-21.5.1998, pp. 61-63. [Google Scholar]
  12. Krajnik, V. et al. (2005). Kriminalistika. Bratislava: Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  13. Krajnik, V. & Straus, J. (2000). Kriminalisticka taktika. Bratislava: Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  14. Metenko, J (2006). Vztah forenznych vied a kriminalistiky z hladiska niektorych metod. Zbornik z II. odborneho seminara Casta – Papiernicka 8. 3. 2006. Bratislava: Kriminalisticky a expertizny ustav Policajneho Zboru. [Google Scholar]
  15. Metenko, J. (2005) Nove trendy v kriminalistickej dokumentacii. Kriminalistika v prikladoch. Zbornik z I. odborneho seminara. Casta – Papiernicka 10.3.2005. Bratislava: [Google Scholar]
  16. Kriminalisticky a expertizny ustav Policajneho Zboru. [Google Scholar]
  17. Metenko, J.(2004). Vztah kriminalistiky k policajným vedam z hladiska ich predmetu a metod. Sbornik odbornych sdeleni z mezinarodni konference „Pokroky v kriminalistice“ 22.9. – 23. 9. 2004. Praha: Policajni Akademie Ceske Republiky. [Google Scholar]
  18. Metenko, J. et al. (2004). Kriminalisticke metody a moznosti kontroly sofistikovanej criminality. 1. vyd. Katedra kriminalistiky a forenznych discipline. Bratislava: Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  19. Metenko, J. (2005) Nove trendy v kriminalistickej dokumentacii. Kriminalistika v prikladoch. Zbornik z I. odborneho seminara. Casta – Papiernicka 10.3.2005. Bratislava: Kriminalisticky a expertizny ustav Policajneho Zboru. [Google Scholar]
  20. Metenko, J (2006). Vztah forenznych vied a kriminalistiky z hladiska niektorych metod. Zbornik z II. odborneho seminara Casta – Papiernicka 8. 3. 2006. Bratislava: Kriminalisticky a expertizny ustav Policajneho Zboru. [Google Scholar]
  21. Metenko, J. (2008) Metódy a postupy práce na mieste činu - slovenská časť projektu : Projekt výskumnej úlohy. / Rieš. výsk. úl. Jozef Meteňko. - 1. vyd. - Bratislava: Akadémia PZ, 2008 Výsk 139 [Google Scholar]
  22. Metenko,J. (2011). Skúmanie miesta činu a skúmanie na mieste činu. In Pokroky v kriminalistike 2011 EU SEC II/B. Bratislava: Akadémia Policajného zboru, 2011. ISBN 978-80-8054-523-9, s. 19-18 [Google Scholar]
  23. Meteňko, J., (2012) Kriminalistická taktika, Akadémia PZ v Bratislave, Bratislava 2012, 1. vydanie, 267 s., ISBN 978-80-8054-553-6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Metenko, J., Bačíková, I., Samek. M., (2013) Kriminalistická taktika, Brno: Václav Klemm – vydavatelství a nakladatelství 2013, 1. vydanie, 307 s., ISBN 978-80-87713-08-2. [Google Scholar]
  25. Meteňko, J., Hejda, J., (2009) Sytémové zmeny vo formách kriminalistickej dokumentácie. In.: Krajníková, M., Masnicová, S., Gýmerská, J., Ed., „Pokroky v kriminalistike 2009“ Zborník z medzinárodnej konferencie konanej v dňoch 9.-10.11.2009, Katedra kriminalistiky a forenzných disciplín, Akadémia PZ v Bratislave, Bratislava 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. Metenko, J & Kubikova, J (2005). Pokroky v kriminalistike. Bratislava: Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  27. Metenko, J., Kloknerova, M. & Kliment, A. (2006). Prevencia criminality mladeze v policajnych cinnostiach 2002-2005. Projekt vyskumu a zaverecna sprava, pp, 21-24. Bratislava: Akademia PZ V Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  28. Musil, J. et al. (2001). Kriminalistika – vybrane problemy teorie a metodologie. Praha: Policajni Akademie Ceske Republiky. [Google Scholar]
  29. National Police, Slovak Republic: Structure and organization, Education/Training. Retrieved [Google Scholar]
  30. July 28, 2008, from: http://polis.osce.org/countries/details.php?item_id=29&lang=fr [Google Scholar]
  31. Ondicová, M. (2003). Úvod do kriminológie. In Kolektív autorov. Kriminológia – všeobecná časť, 1. diel, pp. 6-29. Bratislava : Akademia policajného zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ondicová, M. (2008). Vzťahy biologickej, psychologickej a sociálnej podstaty človeka ako prvopáchateľa trestného činu. Dizertačná práca vo vednom odbore: 92-65-9 Kriminológia, Kriminalistika. Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ondrus, M. (2007). Kriminalisticko-takticke metody v skratenom vysetrovani. Rigorozna praca. Bratislava: Akademia Policajneho Zboru v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  34. Osterburga, J. W. (1968). Police Science: What problem must criminalistics solve. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 59(3), 427. [Google Scholar]
  35. Porada, V. et al. (2007). Kriminalistika. Bratislava: vydavatelstvo pravnickej literatury IURA EDITION, s.r.o. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rossmo, D.K. (2000). Geographic Profiling. Boca Ranton, Florida: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sacco, V. F. & Kennedy, L. W. (2002). The Criminal Event: An introduction to Criminology in Canada, 3rd ed. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning. [Google Scholar]
  38. Simovcek, I. (1998). Niektore teoreticke otazky kriminalistickej vedy. Kriminalisticke dni na Slovensku. Zbornik materialov z vedeckej konferencie konanej dna 20.-21.5.1998, pp. 5-13. [Google Scholar]
  39. Straus, J. (2005). System Kriminalistiky. Policajna Teoria a Prax, Rocnik XIII. 3/2005, pp. 5-15. [Google Scholar]
  40. Straus, J. et al. (2004). Uvod do kriminalistiky. Plzen: Vydavatelstvi a nakladatelstvi Ales Cenek, a. s. [Google Scholar]
  41. Svitok, S. (1998). Vyznam previerky vypovede na mieste. Kriminalisticke dni na Slovensku. Zbornik materialov z vedeckej konferencie konanej dna 20.-21.5.1998, pp. 131-135. [Google Scholar]
  42. Turayova, Y & Mikus, P (2003). Kriminologia, vseobecna cast 1.diel. Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Allen, B. (2007). Criminal Investigation: In Search of the truth. Toronto: Pearson Education Canada. [Google Scholar]
  44. Viktoryova, J. & Zanovit, J. (2007). Zamyslenie sa nad taktikou vykonania vysetrovacieho pokusu. Kriminalisticky Zbornik, rocnik 3, pp. 41-46. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wecht, C.H. (2004). Crime scene investigation: crack the case with real-life experts. Pleasantville, New York: The Reader’s Digest Association. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zavalidroga, S. et al (1995). Kriminalisticka Taktika. Bratislava: Akademia PZ v Bratislave. [Google Scholar]