Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Online First

Articles

The European Standard of Protection of Medical Data

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9595  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

The aim of the study is to interpret the normative structure of the European standard for the protection of medical data as shaped in the case law and practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Adopting a dogmatic-legal approach, the author analyses the following cases: Z v. Finland, I v. Finland; Mockutė v. Lithuania; P. and S. v. Poland, M.S. v. Sweden; Konovalova v. Russia; Frâncu v. Romania; and Y.G. v. Russia in order to identify its elements. This analysis concludes that the standard for medical data limits the permissible extent of State Parties’ interference with individuals’ right to privacy concerning the collection, processing, and storage of their health information. It also designates the State Parties to the Convention as the entities responsible for both positive and negative obligations, while recognizing every individual as the rights holder.

References

  1. Borucka-Arctowa, Maria. 1982. “Badania socjologiczno-prawne a dogmatyka prawa.” In Zagadnienia metodologiczne prawoznawstwa. Materiały z sesji naukowej, Łódź 27–28 marca 1980 roku, edited by Jerzy Wróblewski, 49-70. Wrocław: Ossolineum. [Google Scholar]
  2. Drzewicki, Krzysztof. 1988. Prawo do rozwoju. Studium z zakresu praw człowieka. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. [Google Scholar]
  3. Etzioni, Amitai. 2010. “The Normativity of Human Rights Is Self-Evident.” Human Rights Quaterly 32, no. 1:187-97. [Google Scholar]
  4. Goffin, Tom. 2021. “European Court of Human Rights: ECHR 2021/1 Case of Francu v. Romania, 13 October 2020, No. 69356/13, Fourth Section.” European Journal of Health Law 28, no. 1:103-107. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunt, Paul. 1996. Reclaiming Social Rights: International and Comparative Perspectives. Ashgate: Dartmouth Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  6. Izdebski, Hubert. 2021. “Metody badań nauk społecznych w nauce prawa administracyjnego.” Roczniki Nauk Prawnych 81, no. 4:25-38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jasudowicz, Tadeusz. 2005. “Konstrukcja normatywna międzynarodowo chronionych praw człowieka.” In Prawa człowieka i ich ochrona, edited by Bożena Gronowska et al., 105-28. Toruń: Wydawnictwo TNOiK. [Google Scholar]
  8. Łasak, Katarzyna. 2023. Prawa społeczne w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Gdańsk: Instytut Wydawniczy EuroPrawo. [Google Scholar]
  9. Michalska, Anna. 1976. Podstawowe prawa człowieka w prawie wewnętrznym a pakty praw człowieka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mulder, Trix. 2019. “The Protection of Data Concerning Health in Europe.” European Data Protection Law Review 5, no. 2:209-20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raman, Jari. 2008. “European Court of Human Rights: Failure to take effective information security measures to protect sensitive personal data violates right to privacy – I v. Finland, no. 20511/03, 17 July 2008.” Computer Law & Security Review 24, no. 6:562-64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska, Agata. 2020. “The Right to Privacy and Medical Confidentiality – Some Remarks in Light of ECHR Case Law.” Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 25, no. 2:185-97. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wróblewski, Jerzy. 1973. “Metody logiczno-językowe prawoznawstwie.” In Metody badania prawa, Wrocław: Polska Akademia Nauk. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wronkowska, Sławomira. 1973. Analiza pojęcia prawa podmiotowego. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.