Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)

Articles

How, for What, When and in Which Direction to Explore Corruption New Model of Study in Reality of Civilization of Information in XXI Century Program of Complete Study Process

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2018.11.2-5  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2018-12-31

Abstract

Corruption remains one of the most dangerous crimes that threatens society. Despite the apparent lack of victims of criminal activity, its effects affect every citizen. Apparently it may seem that the deeds that make up this category of crimes have already been well researched. The subject and aspects of crimes in this category were explored, as well as the ways in which criminals acted. The results of the studies carried out so far have devalued in the context of the conditions of existence of the information society of the 21st century, which requires the development of a new paradigm of corruption.

References

  1. Abbink, Klaus. 2004. “Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: an experimental study.” European Journal of Political Economy 20(4):887–906. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbink, Klaus. 2005. “Fair Salaries and the Moral Costs of Corruption.” In Advances in Cognitive Economics, edited by Boicho Kokinov, 286–292. Sofia: NBU Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, Olga Y. 2017. “Institutional Approach to Anti-corruption Efforts in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Mainland China: Improving the Norms, Strengthening the Ethics.” Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal 3(1):247–283. [Google Scholar]
  4. Depken, Craig, and Courtney Lafountain. 2006. “Fiscal consequences of public corruption: Empirical evidence from state bond ratings.” Public Choice 126(1):75–85. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dincer, Oguzhan. C., and Micheal Johnston. 2015. Measuring Illegal and Legal Corruption in American States: Some Results from the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Corruption in America Survey. Safra Center for Ethics Corruption in America Survey (March 16, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Dix, Sarah, and Emanuel Pok. 2009. “Combating Corruption in Traditional Societies.” In Corruption, global security, and world order, edited by Robert I. Rotberg, and Matthew Bunn, 239–259. Cambridge: Mass: World Peace Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  7. Heywood, Paul, and Jan Meyer–Sahling. 2013. “Danger Zones of Corruption: How Management of the Ministerial Bureaucracy Affects Corruption Risks in Poland.” Public Administration and Development 33(3):191–204. [Google Scholar]
  8. Holmberg, Sorein, and Bo Rothstein. 2011. “Dying of corruption.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 6(4):529–547. [Google Scholar]
  9. Iqbal, M. Sohel, and Jin-Wan Seo. 2008. “E-Governance as an anti-corruption tool: Korean Cases.” Journal of Korean 6:51–78. In http://www.karis21.or.kr/karis21admin/adaction/down/03Iqbal_Seo.pdf [accessed: 7.04.2018]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mandal, Biswajt, and Sugata Marjit. 2010. “Corruption and wage inequality?.” International Review of Economics and Finance 19(1):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Shim, Doung C., and Tae H. Eom. 2008. “E-Governmentand Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of international Data.” International Journal of Public Administration 31(3):298–316. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.