Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)

Articles

Best of the Best of the Best? How International are Top International Law Journals Really?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2021.14.1-35  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-07-21

Abstract

This paper reports a pilot study on publication patterns in the twelve top international, single-subject law journals. It has been found that these journals almost exclusively publish US law school-affiliated authors, with foreign-based lawyers authoring less than 5% of all the papers published in these journals. This outcome contrasts heavily with the outcomes for the control group of multidisciplinary science journals, where authorship distribution conformed with the number of scientists working in three macro-regions (US, EU, and China). The results of this study indicate that law journals are most probably jurisdiction-focused, and the number of citations relies more on the size of a jurisdiction covered by the journal than on the international appreciation of the texts. Furthermore, it may indicate that bibliometric factors used to measure scientific output cannot be applied 1:1 to measure the quality of legal research.

References

  1. Barak, Aharon. 2002. “Some Reflections on the Israeli Legal System and Its Judiciary.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 6, no. 1. http://www.ejcl.org/61/art61-1.html [accessed: 21.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biagioli, Mario, and Alexandra Lippman (eds.). 2020. Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Franssen, Thomas, and Paul Wouters. 2019. “Science and Its Significant Other: Representing the Humanities in Bibliometric Scholarship.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, no. 10:1124–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24206 [Google Scholar]
  4. Harzing, Anne–Wil. 2017. “Running the REF on a Rainy Sunday Afternoon: Do Metrics Match Peer Review?” Harzing.com. https://harzing.com/blog/2017/08/running-the-ref-on-a-rainysunday-afternoon [accessed: 27.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hicks, Diana. 2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41, no. 2:251–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hojnik, Janja. 2018. “Evaluation of Academic Legal Publications in Slovenia.” In Evaluating Academic Legal Research in Europe, edited by Rob van Gestel, and Andreas Lienhard, 341–83. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2019 [Google Scholar]
  7. Jonkers Koen, and Thomas Zacharewicz. 2018. “Research Performance-Based Funding Systems: a Comparative Assessment.” EUR 27837 EN, European Union 2016. https://rio.jrc.ec.europa. eu/sites/default/files/Performance%20Based%20Funding%20report_JRC101043.pdf [accessed: 27.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kulczycki, Emanuel, Tim C. Engels, Janne Pölönen, et al. 2018. “Publication Patternsin the Social Sciences and Humanities: Evidence from Eight European Countries.” Scientometrics 116, no. 1:463–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kulczycki, Emanuel. 2019. “Wzory publikacyjne polskich naukowców w latach 2013–2016. Nauki humanistyczne i nauki społeczne – Badanie wzorców doskonałości w nauce i sztuce.” http://excellence-project.zut.edu.pl/2019/01/15/raport-wzory-publikacyjne-polskich-naukow cow-w-latach-2013-2016/ [accessed: 27.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Letto–Vanamo, Pia. 2018. “Evaluation of academic legal publications in Finland.” In Evaluating Academic Legal Research in Europe, edited by Rob van Gestel, and Andreas Lienhard, 218– 37. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewis, Margaret K. 2019. “Forging Taiwan’s legal identity.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 44 no. 2. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1933&context=bjil [Google Scholar]
  12. Mac Sithigh, Daithi. 2019. “Evaluation of academic legal publications in the United Kingdom.” In Evaluating Academic Legal Research in Europe, edited by Rob van Gestel, and Andreas Lienhard, 20–55. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahy, Petra, and Jonathan P. Sale. 2015. “Classifying the Legal System of the Philippines: A Preliminary Analysis with Reference to Labor Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.2436786 [Google Scholar]
  14. Muller, Jerry Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Rivlin, Eliezer. 2012. “Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction.” McGill Law Journal 57, no. 4:781–89. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/article/israel-as-a-mixed-jurisdiction/ [accessed: 21.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sivertsen, Gunnar. 2009. “Publication patterns in all fields.” In Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies. A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday. Special volume of the e-newsletter of the ISSI. Vol. 05-S June 2009, edited by Fredrik Åström, Rickard Danell, Birger Larsen, et al., 55–60. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. https://www.issi-society.org/media/1053/ollepersson60.pdf [accessed: 21.03.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Der Merwe Cornie, Jacques Du Plessis, Marius De Waal, et al. 2012. “The Republic of South Africa.” In Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, edited by Vernon Valentine Palmer, 95–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Verleysen, Frederik T., and Arie Weeren. 2019. “Mapping Diversity of Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: An Approach Making Use of Fuzzy Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Data and Information Science 1, no. 4:33–59. https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201624 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zacharewicz, Thomas, Benedetto Lepori, Emanuela Reale, et al. 2018. “Performance-Based Research Funding in EU Member States – a Comparative Assessment.” Science and Public Policy 46, no. 1:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.