Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
EPPiSM Baner

No. 2/2026/78 (2026)

Artykuły

Who Is Right: Professional or AI

Published: 2026-06-30

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, a discovery that is not exactly new but has been highly developed in recent years, is penetrating all social, economic, and, more recently, legal sectors. Professionals, at first curious, are approaching and trying AI, some even discovering
advantages in its use, which they should start practicing. Others, more cautious, are wondering if they will be replaced in their work by these intelligent systems. Regarding the specific activities of justice, what we know so far is that AI can be useful for gathering and identifying data, norms, and doctrinal materials, organizing them, summarizing, extracting ideas, correcting grammatical errors, translating, editing texts, and even identifying solutions for specific cases. However, using an unsecured system without a transparent methodology can easily lead to copyright infringement, data privacy violations, or other rights violations of individuals. Even the solutions offered instantly are often not legally correct, AI indeed learns, and it depends only on us what...
The study aims to identify several arguments for and against the use of AI in justice; however, one aspect is clear for now: human intervention must not be eliminated.

References

  1. Alecu-Ciocîrlan, A. (2022), Inteligența artificială în avocatură. Unde suntem și spre ce ne îndreptăm?, ttps://www.juridice.ro/684393/inteligenta-artificiala-in-avocatura-unde-suntem-si-spre-ce-ne-indreptam.html. [Google Scholar]
  2. Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Varma, A. […] (2023), Human Resource Management in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives and Research Direction ChatGPT, ‘Human Resource Management Journal’, 33(3), 606–659; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12524. [Google Scholar]
  3. Buju Stanciu & Asociații launch Lawren.ai, first Romanian juridical chatbot juridic based on AI [25.06.2024], ttps://www.juridice.ro/741189/buju-stanciu-si-asociatii-lanseaza-lawren-ai-primul-chatbot-juridic- romanesc-bazat-pe-inteligenta-artificiala.html. [Google Scholar]
  4. Goga, A. S. (2024), Managementul industriei juridice bazate pe inteligență artificială. Studiu de caz: Agenții AI în domeniul juridic din România: O analiză empirică a provocărilor legale, etice și tehnologice, https://www.juridice.ro/766277/managemen-tul-industriei-juridice-bazate-pe-inteligenta-artificiala-studiu-de-caz-agentii-ai-in-domeniul-juridic-din-romania-o-analiza-empirica-a-provocarilor-legale-etice-si-tehnologice.html. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goga, A. S. (2025), Utilizarea inteligenței artificiale în juridic și judiciar – avantaje și dezavantaje, https://www.juridice.ro/768913/utilizarea-inteligentei-artificiale-in-juridic-si-judiciar-avantaje-si-dezavantaje.html. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marguerit, D. (2025), Augmenting or Automating Labor? The Effect of AI Development on New Work, Employment, and Wages, doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.19159. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mutascu, M. (2021), Artificial Intelligence and Unemployment: New Insights, Economic Analysis and Policy, Volume 69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Obreja, D., Rughiniș, R., Rosner, D., (2025), Mapping the Multidimensional Trend of Generative AI: A Bibliometric Analysis and Qualitative Thematic Review, ‘Computers in Human Behavior Reports’ 17 [March 2025] 100576. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pereira, V., Hadjielias, E., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D. (2023), A Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workplace Outcomes: A Multi-Process Perspective, ‘Human Resource Management Review’, vol. 33, 1, 100857, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100857, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105348222100036X. [Google Scholar]
  10. Perlman, A. (2024), The Implications of ChatGPT For Legal Services and Society, 30 ‘Michigan Technology Law Review’, Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mtlr/vol30/iss1/4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Săvescu, A., Aioanei, B. (2024), Juridice AI Inteligențele artificiale în slujba profesioniștilor dreptului [ai.juridice.ro], 25.09.2024, https://www.juridice.ro/752796/juridice-ai-inteligentele-artificiale-puse-in-slujba- profesionistilor-dreptului.html. Săvescu, A. (2025), Nu îmi place deloc inteligența artificială în domeniul juridic, https://www.juridice.ro/785259/nu-imi-place-deloc-inteligenta-artificiala-in-domeniul-juridic.html. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shen, Y., Zhang, X. (2024), The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employment: the Role of Virtual Agglomeration, ‘Humanit Soc Sci Commun’ 11, 122, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02647-9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sloan, K. (2024), AI Can Narrow Justice Gap, But Women Lawyers Slower to Adopt It, Berkeley Study Shows, https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/ai-can-narrow-justicegap-women-lawyers-slower-adopt-it- berkeley-study-shows-2024-03-21/?utm_source=chatgpt.com. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomsons Reuters (2024), How AI Is Transforming the Legal Profession? Jan, 16, 2025, about 2024 Future of Professionals Report. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/how-ai-is-transforming-the-legal- profession/. [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomson Reuters (2025), Why Small Law Firms Need Professional-Grade AI, Not Consumer Tools, Aug, 7, 2025 https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/why-small-law-firmsneed-professional-grade-ai-not- consumer-tools/. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vasile, G. (2024), Inteligența Artificială în Avocatură: Eficiență, Etică și Evoluție, https://www.juridice.ro/729555/inteligenta-artificiala-in-avocatura-eficienta-etica-si-evolutie.html. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vesna, L., Sawale, P., Kaul, P., Pal, S., Ramana Murthy B. (2025), Digital Divide in AI-Powered Education: Challenges and Solutions for Equitable Learning, ‘Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management’ 10(21s): 300–308, DOI:10.52783/jisem.v10i21s.3327. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaite, R., Korzyński, P., Mazurek, G., Paliszkiewicz, J., Ziemba, E. (2023), The Dark Side of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Analysis of Controversies and Risks of ChatGPT, ‘Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review’, 11(2), 7–30. https://eber.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/eber/article/view/2113. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.