Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie

Tom 14 Nr 2 (2021)

Artykuły

Competition Law and Artificial Intelligence – Challenges and Opportunities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2021.14.2-24  [Google Scholar]
Opublikowane: 19.07.2022

Abstrakt

The dynamic development and expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), one of the most important technologies currently being developed in the world, which may herald the fourth technological revolution, brings not only numerous benefits, but also threats in many spheres of socio-economic life, including law. This breakthrough technology also creates a number of challenges and opportunities for the science and practice of competition law (or antitrust law). The aim of this study is to show the pro- and anticompetitive effects of AI implementation, as well as to identify and outline the key challenges and opportunities that these effects have on competition law. This paper is intended to serve as an introduction to the subject matter. It does not claim to examine it exhaustively, but rather to inspire its further, more extensive and in-depth analysis.

Bibliografia

  1. Blockx, Jan. 2017. “Antitrust in Digital Markets in the EU: Policing Price Bots.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=2987705 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Botta, Marco, and Klaus Wiedemann. 2020. “To discriminate or not to discriminate? Personalised pricing in online markets as exploitative abuse of dominance.” European Journal of Law and Economics 50, no. 3:381–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-019-09636-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Budzinski, Oliver, Victoriia Noskova, and Xijie Zhang. 2019. “The Brave New World of Digital Personal Assistants: Benefits and Challenges from an Economic Perspective.” Netnomics 20 (2):177–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-019-09133-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockburn, Iain M., Rebecca Henderson, and Scott Stern. 2018. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation.” NBER Working Paper 24449. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24449 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24449 [Google Scholar]
  5. Colangelo, Giuseppe. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and Anticompetitive Collusion in EU and the U.S.: From the ‘Meeting of Minds’ towards the ‘Meeting of Algorithms’?” TTLF Working Papers No. 74, Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum. https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/colangelo_wp74.pdf [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509950713.ch-013 [Google Scholar]
  6. Colombo, Niccolò. 2018. “Virtual Competition: Human Liability Vis-À-Vis Artificial Intelligence’s Anticompetitive Behaviours.” European Competition and Regulatory Law Review 2, no. 1:11–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2018/1/5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cseres, Kati. 2007. “The Controversies of the Consumer Welfare Standard.” Competition Law Review 3, no. 2:121–73. [Google Scholar]
  8. Daskalova, Victoria. 2015. “Consumer Welfare in EU Competition Law: What Is It (Not) About?” Competition Law Review 11, no. 1:133–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2605777 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derdak, Michał K. 2018. “Czy androidy śnią o zmowach cenowych? Algorytmy cenowe, sztuczna inteligencja i prawo konkurencji.” Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 8 (7):73–82. [Google Scholar]
  10. Drexl, Josef, Wolfgang Kerber, and Rupprecht Podszun, ed. 2011. Competition Policy and the Economic Approach: Foundations and Limitations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930330 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ezrachi, Eriel, and Maurice E. Stucke. 2016. Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of Algorithm-Driven Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674973336 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ezrachi, Ariel, and Maurice E. Stucke 2017. “Artificial Intelligence & Collusion: When Computers Inhibit Competition.” University of Illinois Law Review 5:1775–810. [Google Scholar]
  13. Faella, Gianluca, and Valerio C. Romano. 2019. “Artificial intelligence and blockchain: an introduction to competition issues.” Competition Law & Policy Debate 5, no. 3:19–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2019.03.02 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gal, Michal, and Thibault Schrepel. 2020. “Algorithms and Competition Law.” Concurrences. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3688324 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Górska, Monika A. 2012. “Concurrence of wills – a necessary ingredient of an agreement restricting competition. Case comment to the judgment of Court of Competition and Consumer Protection of 8 February 2011 – ZST Gamrat S.A. v President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Ref. No. XVII Ama 16/10).” Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 5 (6):289–95. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gürkaynak, Gonenc. 2019. “Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence: An Optimist Approach to Efficiencies.” Competition Law & Policy Debate Journal 5, no. 3:29–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2019.03.04 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2019. “Is Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle Imperiled?” Journal of Corporation Law 45, no. 1:101–30. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2020. “On The Meaning of Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle.” Concurrentialiste. https://leconcurrentialiste.com/herbert-hovenkamp-meaning-consumer--welfare/ [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huber, Martin, and David Imhof. 2019. “Machine learning with screens for detecting bid-rigging cartels.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 65 (C):277–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ittoo, Ashwin, and Nicolas Petit. 2017. “Algorithmic Pricing Agents and Tacit Collusion: A Technological Perspective.” In L’intelligence artificielle et le droit, edited by Hervé Jacquemin, and Alexandre de Streel, 241–56. Brussels: Larcier. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046405 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046405 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kranzberg, Melvin. 1986. “Technology and History: Kranzberg’s Laws.” Technology and Culture 27, no. 3:544–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marx, Lorenz, Christian Ritz, and Jonas Weller. 2019. “Liability for outsourced algorithmic collusion – A practical approximation.” Concurrences 2:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  23. McSweeny, Terrell, and Brian O’Dea. 2017. “The Implications of Algorithmic Pricing for Coordinated Effects Analysis and Price Discrimination Markets in Antitrust Enforcement.” Antitrust 32, no. 1:75–81. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mehra, Salil K. 2016. “Antitrust and the Robo-Seller: Competition in the Time of Algorithms.” Minnesota Law Review 100:1323–375. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miąsik, Dawid. 2008. “Controlled Chaos with Consumer Welfare as the Winner – a Study of the Goals of Polish Antitrust Law.” Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 1 (1):33–57. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mleczko, Marcin. 2018. “Technologiczne wyzwania dla antropocentrycznego prawa konkurencji na przykładzie algorytmicznego ustalania cen w sektorze e-commerce.” Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 8 (7):63–72. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nizioł, Krystyna. 2019. “Ekonomizacja prawa ochrony konkurencji.” In Krystyna Nizioł, and Michał Peno, Ekonomiczna analiza prawa publicznego. Problemy, konteksty, zastosowania, 127–45. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. [Google Scholar]
  28. Noethlich, Kaylynn. 2019. “Artificially Intelligent and Free to Monopolize: A New Threat to Competitive Markets Around the World.” American University International Law Review 34, no. 4:923–76. [Google Scholar]
  29. Orbach, Barak Y. 2011. “The Antitrust Consumer Welfare Paradox.” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 7, no. 1:133–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhq019 [Google Scholar]
  30. Patakyová, Mária T. 2019. “Initial Thoughts on Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Bid Rigging.” EU Business Law Working Papers 1/2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458035 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458035 [Google Scholar]
  31. Petit, Nicolas. 2013. “The Oligopoly Problem in EU Competition Law.” In Research Handbook on European Competition Law, edited by Ioannis Liannos, and Damien Geradin, 259–349. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1999829 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006023.00015 [Google Scholar]
  32. Piszcz, Anna. 2009. “Ekonomizacja prawa antymonopolowego.” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług 45:501–509. [Google Scholar]
  33. Posner, Richard A. 1969. “Oligopoly and the Antitrust Laws: A Suggested Approach.” Stanford Law Review 21:1562–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1227523 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rajpurohit, Damodar S., and Rishika Seal. 2019. “Legal Definition of Artificial Intelligence.” Supremo Amicus 10:87–95. https://supremoamicus.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/A13v10.pdf [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rees, Ray. 1993. “Tacit Collusion.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 9, no. 2:27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/9.2.27 [Google Scholar]
  36. Reyna, Agustín. 2019. “The Shaping of a European Consumer Welfare Standard for the Digital Age.” Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 10, no. 1:1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpz001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rha, Jong-Youn, and Richard Widdows. 2002. “The Internet and the Consumer: Countervailing Power Revisited.” Prometheus 20, no. 2:107–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020210137493 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schrepel, Thibault. 2017. “Here’s why algorithms are NOT (really) a thing.” Concurrentialiste. https://leconcurrentialiste.com/algorithms-based-practices-antitrust/ [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schuett, Jonas. 2019. “A Legal Definition of AI.” http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3453632 [accessed: 08.05.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3453632 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwab, Klaus. 2018. Czwarta rewolucja przemysłowa. Translated by Anna D. Kamińska. Warsaw: Studio Emka. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwalbe, Ulrich. 2018. “Algorithms, Machine Learning, and Collusion.” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 14, no. 4:568–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhz004 [Google Scholar]
  42. Skalfist, Peter, Daniel Mikelsten, and Vasil Teigens. 2020. Sztuczna inteligencja: czwarta rewolucja przemysłowa. Translated by C.S.B. Equipment, Cambridge Stanford Books. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stone, Peter, et al. 2016. “Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030.” One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015–2016 Study Panel. Stanford University. http://ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  44. Turner, Jacob. 2019. Robot Rules. Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96235-1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Vestager, Margrethe. 2017. “Full transcript: European Union competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager on Recode Decode.” https://www.vox.com/2017/12/9/16752750/european-union-eu-competition-commissioner-margrethe-vestager-recode-decode-lisbon-web-summit [accessed: 08.05.2021]. [Google Scholar]
  46. Von Bonin, Andreas, and Sharon Malhi. 2020. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Competition Law Enforcement.” Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 11, no. 8:468–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpaa077 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wieczorek, Łukasz. 2011. “Prawne i ekonomiczne aspekty kolektywnej pozycji dominującej w prawie konkurencji.” Przegląd Prawa Handlowego 7:25–39. [Google Scholar]
  48. Witt, Anne C. 2016. The More Economic Approach to EU Antitrust Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474202350 [Google Scholar]
  49. Woodcock, Ramsi A. 2019. “Personalized Pricing as Monopolization.” Connecticut Law Review 51, no. 2:311–73. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zalewski, Tomasz. 2020. “Definicja sztucznej inteligencji.” In Prawo sztucznej inteligencji, edited by Luigi Lai, and Marek Świerczyński, 1–14. Warsaw: C.H.Beck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.7217 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.