Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019)

Articles

The Development of Modern Technologies in the Context of the Lawmaking Process on the Example of AI Strategy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2019.12.2-4  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2019-12-31

Abstract

Modern technologies create foundations for economic growth and they are of crucial importance for all sectors of economy and society. I’m sure you will agree with me that these days electronic payments, computing clouds and robot – robot communication are becoming more and more popular. The question is what are the borders of development and influence of technology on law making? On the one hand, new technologies determine development but they have to be limited by certain rights, for example the law of industrial property. On the other hand, these technological innovations interfere with these rights and it’s more difficult to protect them. That’s why this situation poses threat to the safety of individuals and citizens. What’s more, practically in every area of human life appear problems of ethical and legal regulations connected with functioning of robots and computers.

References

  1. Braman, Sandra. 2006. Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chałubińska–Jentkiewicz, Katarzyna. 2011. Media audiowizualne. Konflikt regulacyjny w dobie cyfryzacji. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chałubińska–Jentkiewicz, Katarzyna. 2014. „Metoda zarządzania publicznego w procesie cyfryzacji na przykładzie zasobów archiwalnych.” W Procesy kierowania w systemie administracji publicznej, red. Jan Łukasiewicz, 65–75. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa Oddział w Rzeszowie. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chałubińska–Jentkiewicz, Katarzyna. 2016. “European administrative unification in the field of culture security.” In Legal Context in the Chosen Order and Security Area, ed. Paweł Kobes, Gerald G. Sander, and Piotr Nadybski, 9–22. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chałubińska–Jentkiewicz, Katarzyna. 2019. Cyberodpowiedzialność. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chałubińska–Jentkiewicz, Katarzyna, i Mirosław Karpiuk. 2015. Prawo nowych technologii. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dervanović, Dena. 2018. “Inhuman Lawyer:Developing Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession.” In Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, ed. Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick, and Nikolaus Forgo, 209–34. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hallevy, Gabriel. 2015. Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems. Switzerland: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2013. “From Galatea 2.2 to Watson- and back?” In Human Law and Computer Law: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Mireille Hildebrandt, and Jeanne Gaakeer, 23–45. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pagallo, Ugo. 2013. The Laws of Robots Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pagallo, Ugo, Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick, and Nikolaus Forgo. 2018. “The Rise of Robotics & AI: Technological Advances. Normative Dilemmas.” In Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, ed. Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick, and Nikolaus Forgo, 1–13. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  12. Szymczak, Mieczysław, red. 1999. Słownik języka polskiego. T. 3. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Zubik, Marek. 2008. „Nowe technologie jako wyzwanie i zagrożenie dla prawa, statusu jednostek i państwa.” W Prawo wobec nowoczesnych technologii, red. Piotr Girdwoyń, 37–50. Warszawa: Liber. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.