Abstract
This article examines how technological innovations in ancient Rome – particularly in road construction – contributed to the empire’s durability and efficiency. By analyzing legal sources, archaeological findings, and historical texts, the author demonstrates that modern digital technologies (AI, 3D modeling, laser scanning) facilitate the reconstruction of ancient infrastructure and highlight the continued relevance of Roman engineering and legal principles. The author argues that Roman engineering solutions, along with legal regulations pertaining to public infrastructure, contributed to the creation of a durable and efficient communication network throughout the Roman Empire. The study is based on the analysis of literary sources, legal texts, and archaeological findings. It demonstrates that Roman law focused primarily on safeguarding public access and ensuring the maintenance of infrastructure, rather than on prescribing detailed technical norms governing construction. Contemporary digital technologies enable in-depth investigations into ancient Roman construction techniques and facilitate the reconstruction of historical structures. The author emphasizes that the engineering and organizational accomplishments of ancient Rome remain relevant and continue to serve as an inspiration for modern interdisciplinary research concerning civilizational heritage. The article concludes by asserting that both ancient and modern technological innovations constitute vital drivers of civilizational development and progress.
References
- Adam, Jean-Pierre, and Anthony Mathews. 2005. Roman building: materials and techniques. London and New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Casson, Lionel.1994. Travel in the Ancient World. Baltimore–London: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Chevallier, Raymond. 1976. Roman Roads. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- DeLaine, Janet. 1997. “The Baths of Caracalla: A Study in the Design, Construction and Economics of Large-Scale Building Projects in Imperial Rome.” Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 25:248. [Google Scholar]
- Frischer, Bernard. 2008. “The Rome Reborn Project: How Technology Is Helping Us to Study History.” OP. Ed, University of Virginia 10:1-5. [Google Scholar]
- Frontinus, Sextus Iulius. De aquaeductu urbis Romae. [Google Scholar]
- Gallo, Isaac M. 2006. Vías romanas: ingeniería y técnica constructiva. Ediciones del Ambroz. [Google Scholar]
- Guidi, Gabriele, et al. 2014. “3D Digitalization of Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 15, no. 6:663-70. [Google Scholar]
- Kamińska, Renata. 2010a. “‘Cura aquarum’ w prawie rzymskim.” Zeszyty Prawnicze UKSW 10, no. 2:93-111. [Google Scholar]
- Kamińska, Renata. 2010b. Ochrona dróg i rzek publicznych w prawie rzymskim w okresie republiki i pryncypatu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UKSW. [Google Scholar]
- Kamińska, Renata. 2015. W trosce o miasto. ‘Cura Urbis’ w Rzymie okresu republiki i pryncypatu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UKSW. [Google Scholar]
- Kamińska, Renata. 2017. “Private and Public Interest in the ‘Interdictum ne quid in loco publico fiat’.” Zeszyty Prawnicze 17, no. 4:197-215. [Google Scholar]
- Kosiński, Leszek J. 1966. “Roman Engineering and Construction Techniques.” Technology and Culture 7, no. 2:187-97. [Google Scholar]
- Laurence, Ray. 2002. The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change. London–New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Lugli, Giuseppe. 1991. La tecnica edilizia romana. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider. [Google Scholar]
- Matteazzi, Michele. 2023. “Road Building in Roman Times: An Insight from Northern Italy.” The Journal of the Roman Roads Research Association III:167-94. [Google Scholar]
- Morillo, Ángel C. 2006. Las vías romanas en Hispania. Ediciones Akal. [Google Scholar]
- Oleson, John P., and Tracey E. Rihll. 2008. “The Oxford Handbook of Engineering and Technology in the Classical World.” Aestimatio: Sources and Studies in the History of Science 5:93-132. [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor, Colin. 1993. Roman Bridges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Procchi, Federico. 2016. ‘Insulae’ e ‘loca publico usui destinata’. Considerazioni a margine dell’interdetto ‘ne quid in loco publico fiat’. Torino: Giappichelli. [Google Scholar]
- Raepsaet, Georges, and Bernd Löhberg. 2013. “Das ‘Itinerarium provinciarum Antonini Augusti’. Ein kaiserzeitliches Straßenverzeichnis des Römischen Reiches.” L’Antiquité Classique 82, no. 1:459-60. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, Olivia F. 1992. Ancient Rome: City Planning and Administration. London–New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Sitek, Bronisław. 1999. Actiones populares w prawie rzymskim na przełomie republiki i pryncypatu. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo US. [Google Scholar]
- Sitek, Bronisław. 2008. Lex Coloniae Genetivae Iuliae seu Ursonensis i lex Irnitana. Ustawy municypalne antycznego Rzymu. Tekst, tłumaczenie i komentarz. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze. [Google Scholar]
- Sitek, Bronisław. 2011. “Zamówienia publiczne (licitatio) sposobem na realizację prac publicznych w antycznym Rzymie.” Verejna Sprava a Spolocnost 12, no. 2:97-101. [Google Scholar]
- Sitek, Bronisław. 2016. “Ultro tributa. Controversie e lacrime d’imprenditori in materia di appalti pubblici (Liv. 39.44).” In Hacia un derecho administrativo, fiscal y medioambiental Romano III, edited by Antonio Fernández De Bujan, Andrea Trisciuoglio, and Gabriel Gerez Kraemer, 697-709. Madrid: Editorial Dykinson, S.L. [Google Scholar]
- Sitek, Bronisław, and Paweł Krajewski. 2005. Rzymskie prawo publiczne. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo UWM. [Google Scholar]
- Trisciuoglio, Andrea. 1991. Sarta tecta, ultratributa, opus publicum faciendum locare. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. [Google Scholar]
- Wójtowicz, Stanisław. 2012. “Podróże w świecie antycznym za czasów św. Pawła.” In Dobrze jest dziękować Panu, edited by Janusz Kręcidło, and Barbara Strzałkowska, 764-87. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UKSW. [Google Scholar]
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
