Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
EPPiSM Baner

No. 1/2026/77 (2026)

Artykuły

Antitrust Implications of Tying Transactions in the Digital Economy

Published: 2026-03-31

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the unique characteristics of tying transactions within digital markets. Emerging competitive conditions have led to novel business models that require analysis through the lens of antitrust laws, specifically focusing on abuse provisions. Historically, the abuse of tying transactions marked the initial significant legal proceedings in the digital economy. Given the lack of standardized terminology concerning tying transactions, a preliminary conceptual clarification is necessary. Before delving into their legal treatment and selected regulatory options, the paper examines the pro-competitive and anti-competitive impacts of such transactions.

References

  1. Choi J. P., Stefanadis Ch., Tying, Investment, and the Dynamic Leverage Theory, “The RAND Journal of Economics” 2001, 32, 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Craig P., de Búrca G., EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 7th Edition, Oxford 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Csurgai-Horváth, G., Is It Unlawful to Favour Oneself? “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies” 2022, 62, 4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Developments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, N. Kryvinska, M. Greguš, S. Fedushko (eds.), Cham 2023, 463. [Google Scholar]
  5. Elhauge E., Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory, “Harvard Law Review” 2009, 123, 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. EU Antitrust: Hot Topics & Next Steps. Proceedings of the International Conference Held in Prague on Jan. 24–25, 2022, V. Šmejkal (ed.), Praha 2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ezrachi A., EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases, London 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. Funta R., Economic and Legal Features of Digital Markets, “Danube: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review” 2019, 10, 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Funta R., Data, Their Relevance to Competition and Search Engines. “Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology” 2021, 15, 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Funta R, Buttler D., The Digital Economy and Legal Challenges, “InterEULawEast” 2023, 10, 1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Funta R., Competition Law Aspects Of Amazon’s Business Model, “Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem” 2023, 15, 2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Holzweber S.: Tying and Bundling in the Digital Era, “European Competition Journal” 2018, 14, 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hovenkamp H., Post-Chicago Antitrust: A Review and Critique. “Columbia Business Law Review” 2001, 2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mandrescu D., Tying and Bundling by Online Platforms – Distinguishing Between Lawful Expansion Strategies and Anti-Competitive Practices, “Computer Law & Security Review” 2021, 40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mulaj V. Protection of Competition from Abuse with Dominant Positions and Anticompetitive Agreements in the Kosovo Market, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2022, 31, 2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Peráček T., E-Commerce and Its Limits in the Context of the Consumer Protection: The Case of the Slovak Republic, “Juridical Tribune” 2022, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
  17. Piskorz-Ryń, A. European Data Governance Act: Essential Problems for Re-Use of Public Sector Information, “Prawo i Więź” [“Law and Social Bonds”] 2025, 53, 6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Plavčan P., Funta R., Regulatory Concepts for Internet Platforms, “Online Journal Modelling the New Europe” 2021, 35 (Apr.). [Google Scholar]
  19. Skara G., Muçollari O., Hajdini B., Adapting the Competition Policy for the Digital Age: Assessing the EU’s Approach. “Laws” 2024, 13, 5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Šmejkal V., Abuse of Dominance and the DMA – Differing Objectives or Prevailing Continuity?. “Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica” 2023, 69, 2. [Google Scholar]
  21. Šmejkal V., Digitisation and EU Competition Law – Time to Rethink the Basics?, “The Lawyer Quarterly” 2024, 14, 1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Spector D., Bundling, Tying, and Collusion, “International Journal of Industrial Organization” 2007, 25, 3 (Jun.). [Google Scholar]
  23. Šramel B., Horváth P., Internet as the Communication Medium of the 21st Century: Do We Need a Special Legal Regulation of Freedom of Expression on the Internet?, “The Lawyer Quarterly” 2021, 11, 1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tóth A., Juhász M. , Juhász D. (eds.), Kommentár a tisztességtelen piaci magatartás és versenykorlátozás tilalmáról szóló 1996. évi LVII [Commentary on Act LVII of 1996 on the Prohibition of Unfair Market Practices and Restriction of Competition], Gazdasági [Google Scholar]
  25. Versenyhivatal [Hungarian Competition Authority]: HVG-ORAC, Budapest 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Whinston M. D., Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion, “The American Economic Review” 1990, 80, 4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu Q., Philipsen N. J., The Law and Economics of Tying in Digital Platforms: Comparing Tencent and Android, “Journal of Competition Law and Economics” 2023, 19, 1. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.