Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
EPPiSM Baner

No. 4 (2022)

Artykuły

Law of the Transition Period

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/eppism.8671  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-05-15

Abstract

The article deals with a relatively new area of research, among others in the legal sciences (vetting law, criminal law, human rights, international law), which is emerging in states building their social justice order as a result of the emergence of circumstances causing a distortion of their functioning – viewed through the prism of contemporary global standards. It is a phenomenon with an extremely broad spectrum, not limited to lawmaking, but furthermore encompassing a range of factual actions and even social attitudes towards historical pasts that must be dealt with in the new realities. The article has a de facto review character, and its objectives are primarily: to emphasize the existence of the main research areas, to show the need for this type
of scientific exploration, and to outline holistically its selected fundamental issues. Thus, the present study sets itself the task not so much of developing the views hither-to expressed on the mechanisms of the transitional response, but of contributing to
their systematization and dissemination.

References

  1. Al-Akhali R., Al-Rawahni O., Biswell A., Transitional Governmnet in post-conflict Yemen, „Rethinking Yemen’s Economy”, 2019, No. 14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bykowska S., Karać czy rehabilitować? Powojenne ustawodawstwo polskie wobec osób wpisanych na Niemiecką Listę Narodowościową, „Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne”, 2012, tom 64, z. 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Goshovska V., Goshovskyi V., Dubchak L., The Implementation of State Policy of Power Cleaning in the Conditions of Political Transformation: experience of Ukraine and countries of central and eastern Europe, „European Journal of Sustainable Development”, 2020, nr 2(9). [Google Scholar]
  4. Krotoszyński M., Lustracja w Polsce w świetle modeli sprawiedliwości okresu tranzycji, Warszawa 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lachowski T., Perspektywa praw ofiar w prawie międzynarodowym: sprawiedliwość okresu przejściowego (transitional justice), Łódź 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Report of the UN Secretary-General, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, UN Doc S/2004/616 (2004), par. 8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Monteiro da Silva Santos V., Truth and justice initiatives in non-transitional contexts: experiences from Latin America, „BPC Policy brief”, 2020, Vol. 9, No. 4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sotiropoulos D.A., Swift Gradualism and Variable Outcomes: vetting in post-authoritarian Greece [w:] Justice as Prevention: vetting public employees in transitional societes, New York 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Steinberg R., Transitional Justice in the Age of the French Revolution, „International Journal of Transitional Justice”, 2013, Vol. 7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Witkowski Z., Lustracja: wyrok z 11 maja 2007 r., K 2/07 [w:] M. Derlatka, L. Garlicki, [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Wiącek, Na straży państwa prawa. Trzydzieści lat orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, WK 2016, LEX/el. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zajadło J., Filozofia prawa a prawo karne. Studium tzw. Mauerschützen, „Ius et Lex”, 2003, nr 1. [Google Scholar]
  13. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/isa/gas02/. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuta C., Lustracja w Polsce na tle krajów Europy Środkowej, „Horyzonty Polityki”, 2014, https://horyzontypolityki.ignatianum.edu.pl/HP/article/view/213/191. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rwanda. Events in 2008, Human Rights Watch 2009, http://www.hrw.org/en/node/79182. [Google Scholar]