Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Problemy Współczesnej Kryminalistyki

Vol. 20 (2016)

Artykuły

Influence the manner of presentation questions on the accuracy of concealed information tests in polygraph examination

  • Marcin Chowaniec
  • Joanna Koczur
  • Marek Leśniak
  • Sylwia Pytlik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/pwk.5536  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-06-07

Abstract

The reported laboratory study is the part of empirical project concerning the variables influencing the accuracy of polygraph examination. The authors carried out an experiment on 51 participants. They were divided in two groups. 27 of them were concealing their knowledge about a particular feature of the case under examination. 24 of them had not got to know about
it. Each group was divided in two parts yet – depending on the manner of question presentation (verbal or as a picture). Each examination included three tests. Every participant’s reactions were organized according to their significance (the size of GSR reactions were taken into consideration). The authors compare the accuracy outcomes of particular groups. The experiments
confirmed author’s original hypothesis about influence the manner of question presentation
on the accuracy of polygraph examination.

References

  1. King B.M., Minium E.W., Statystyka dla psychologów i pedagogów, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Risinger M. D., Handwriting identufication, w: Faigman D. I., Saks M. J.,. Anders J., Cheng E. K. (ed.), Modern scientific evidence. The law and science of export testimony, Eagen, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  3. Maruszewski T., Psychologia poznania. Umysł i świat, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2011 [Google Scholar]
  4. Kovalenko A., Saldziunas V., The Event Knowledge Test (EKT) in Polygraph Examination (common notice of tactics), „European Polygraph” 2008, t. 2, nr 3–4 (5–6) [Google Scholar]
  5. Dilts R.B., Sleight of Mouth, Meta Publications, Capitola 1999 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibek A., Gołaszewski M., Z zagadnień poprawności opiniowania w badaniach poligraficznych, Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały 2012, nr 1(10) [Google Scholar]
  7. Widacki J., W sprawie wyboru techniki badania poligraficznego. Czy technika oparta na testach GKT (CIT) jest lepsza od techniki opartej na testach CQ?, „Problemy Kryminalistyki” 2011, nr 273(3), s. 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wicklander D.E., Zulawski D.E., Practical Aspects of Interview and Interrogation. Second Edition, CRC PRESS, Boca Raton–London –New York–Washington D.C. 2002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gołaszewski M. (red.), Współczesne standardy badań poligraficznych, Agencja Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego. Centralny Ośrodek Szkolenia im. gen. dyw. Stefana Roweckiego „Grota”, Warszawa 2013 [Google Scholar]
  10. Widacki J., Kryminalistyka, wyd. 2, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2012 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakayama M., Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan, w: Kleiner M. , Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press, London 2002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaworski R., Application of situational sequencing test in the case of Police officers suspected of murder and POT tests as „Knowledge of the perpetrator test”, „Journal of Forensic Identification” 2001, t. 51, nr 2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Konieczny J., Badania poligraficzne. Podręcznik dla zawodowców, Wydawnictwa Akademicki i Profesjonalne, Warszawa 2009 [Google Scholar]
  14. Widacki J. (red.), Badania poligraficzne w Polsce, Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne, Kraków 2014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gruza E., Psychologia sądowa dla prawników, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kulicki M. (red.), Wariografia kryminalistyczna, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Policji, Szczytno 1998. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wójcikiewicz J., CIT czy CQT, „Problemy Kryminalistyki” 2012, nr 275 [Google Scholar]