Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Tom 9 (2016)

Artykuły

Zakaz tortur jako sposób zwalczania przemocy wobec podmiotów szczególnie narażonych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.6226  [Google Scholar]
Opublikowane: 31.12.2016

Abstrakt

Artykuł dotyczy wolności od tortur i nieludzkiego lub poniżającego traktowania. Potrzeba zapewnienia człowiekowi szczególnej ochrony prawnej przed zamachami na jego życie, zdrowie, wolność, nietykalność i godność uświadomiła społeczności międzynarodowej, że są to dobra, które należy chronić prawnie. Dokumenty z zakresu praw człowieka dotyczące zakazu tortur i orzecznictwo międzynarodowych sądów w tym zakresie wskazują, iż wolność od tortur jest uznawana za normę ius cogens – normę bezwzględną od której żadne odstępstwo nie jest dopuszczalne. W artykule zwrócono uwagę na podmioty szczególnie narażone na przemoc: osoby zatrzymane, kobiety i cudzoziemcy oraz dzieci.

Bibliografia

  1. Como. Rapp., December 12th 1981, Reed. [Google Scholar]
  2. Como., Rapp., December 14th 1973, Patel. [Google Scholar]
  3. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms drawn up in Rome on November 4th 1950, further amended with Protocols No. 3, 5 and 8 and complemented with Protocol No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as ECHR), Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] No. 61, item 284. [Google Scholar]
  4. Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention), opened for signature on May 11th 2011, STE nº 120. [Google Scholar]
  5. European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment was created in Strasbourg, on November 26th 1987, Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] 1995, No. 46, item 238. [Google Scholar]
  6. General Comment No. 7 of 1982. [Google Scholar]
  7. General Comment No. 20 of 1992. [Google Scholar]
  8. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavla, Procureur v. Furundzija, December 10th 1998. [Google Scholar]
  9. Judgment of the ECtHR, Ireland v. The United Kingdom, January 18h 1978. [Google Scholar]
  10. Judgment of the ECtHR, Tyrer v. The United Kingdom, April 25th 1978. [Google Scholar]
  11. Judgment of the ECtHR, Campbel and Cosans v. The United Kingdom, January 29th 1982. [Google Scholar]
  12. Judgment of the ECtHR, Cambell and Fell v. The United Kingdom, June 28th 1984. [Google Scholar]
  13. Judgment of the ECtHR, Soering v. The United Kingdom, July 7th 1989. [Google Scholar]
  14. Judgment of the ECtHR, Tomasi v. France, Aut. 27th 1992. [Google Scholar]
  15. Judgment of the ECtHR, Hurtado v. Suisse, Jan. 28th 1994. [Google Scholar]
  16. Judgment of the ECtHR, Chahal v. United Kingdom, November 15th 1996. [Google Scholar]
  17. Judgment of the ECtHR, Aksoy v. Turkey, December 18th 1996. [Google Scholar]
  18. Judgment of the ECtHR, HRL v. France, April 29th 1997. [Google Scholar]
  19. Judgment of the ECtHR, D. v. The United Kingdom, May 2nd 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Judgment of the ECtHR, Aydin v. Turkey, September 25th 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Judgment of the ECtHR A v. The United Kingdom, September 23rd 1998. [Google Scholar]
  22. Judgment of the ECtHR, Assenov v. Bulgaria, October 28th 1998. [Google Scholar]
  23. Judgment of the ECtHR, Selmouni v. France, July 28th 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Judgment of the ECtHR, Grand Chamber, Kudla v. Poland, October 26th 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. Judgment of the ECtHR, Dougoz v. Greece, March 6th 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Judgment of the ECtHR, Keenan v. United Kingdom, April 3rd 2001. [Google Scholar]
  27. Judgment of the ECtHR, Peers v. Greece, April 19th 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Judgment of the ECtHR Z et al v. The United Kingdom, May 10th 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Judgment of the ECtHR, Price v. The United Kingdom, July 17th 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Judgment of the ECtHR, Grand Chamber, Al-Adsdani v. The United Kingdom, November 21st 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Judgment of the ECtHR, Kalashnikov v. Russia, July 15th 2002. [Google Scholar]
  32. Judgment of the ECtHR, Mouisel v. France, November 14th 2002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Judgment of the ECtHR, M.C. v. Bulgaria, December 4th 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Judgment of the ECtHR, Frérot v. France, June 12th 2007. [Google Scholar]
  35. Judgment of the ECtHR, Tremblay v. France, September 11th 2007. [Google Scholar]
  36. Judgment of the ECtHR, Remlde v. France, October 16th 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Judgment of the ECtHR, Opuz v. Turkey, June 9th 2009. [Google Scholar]
  38. Judgment of the ECtHR Khider v. France, July 9th 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. Judgment of the ECtHR, Kashavelov v. Bulgaria, Jan. 20th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  40. Judgment of the ECtHR El Shennawy v. France, January 20th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  41. Judgment of the ECtHR, Payet v. France, January 21st 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Judgment of the ECtHR, Yasgũl Yĩhmaz v. Turkey, February 1st 2011. [Google Scholar]
  43. Judgment of the ECtHR, Rahini v. Greece, April 5th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  44. Judgment of the ECtHR, Decision, Izevbekhal et al v. Ireland, May 17th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  45. Judgment of the ECtHR, R.R. v. Poland, May 26th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  46. Judgment of the ECtHR, Stasi v. France, October 20th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  47. Judgment of the ECtHR, Alborreo v. France, October 20th 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Judgment of the ECtHR, Popov v. France, January 19th 2012. [Google Scholar]
  49. Judgment of the ECtHR, Kaverzin v. Ukraine, May 15th 2012. [Google Scholar]
  50. Judgment of the ECtHR, Grand Chamber, Idalov v. Russia, May 22nd 2012. [Google Scholar]
  51. Protocol 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [Google Scholar]
  52. Resolution 1247 (2001), issued on May 22nd 2001, referring to sexual mutilation of women, sections 6 and 7. [Google Scholar]
  53. The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, adopted on December 3rd 1984, came into force on June 26th 1987, Dz. U. [Journal of Laws] 1989, No. 63, item 378 with the appendix. [Google Scholar]
  54. Burgorgue-Larsen, L., 2012. La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, L.G.D.J.-Montchrestien, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  55. Garlicki, L., 2010. Commentary, art. 3, [in:] Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności. Komentarz do artykułów 1–18, ed. L. Garlicki, Warszawa. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gronowska, B., 2010. Wolność od tortur [Freedom from Tortures], [in:] B. Gronowska, T. Jasudowicz, M. Balcerzak, M. Lubiszewski, R. Mizerski, Prawa człowieka i ich ochrona [Human rights and protection thereof], Toruń. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hołda, J., Hołda, Z., Ostrowska, D., Rybczyńska, J.A., 2011. Prawa człowieka. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa. [Google Scholar]
  58. Joseph, S., Castan, M., 2013. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Cases, Materials, and Commentary, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  59. Komitety Traktatowe ONZ [UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies], [in:] Leksykon ochrony praw człowieka. 100 podstawowych pojęć [Lexicon on Protection of the Human Rights. 100 basic terms], eds. M. Balcerzak, S. Sykuna, Warszawa 2010. [Google Scholar]
  60. Law of The European Convention on Human Rights, eds. D.J. Harris, M. O’Boyle, C. Warbrick, Oxford 2014. [Google Scholar]
  61. Niełaczna, M., 2010. Europejski Komitet Zapobiegania Torturom. Między kontrolą a stanowczością, Warszawa. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nowicki, M.A., 2013. Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka, Warszawa. [Google Scholar]
  63. Skupiński, J., 1991. Zakaz stosowania tortur lub innego nieludzkiego traktowania [Prohibition of Torture or other Inhumane Treatment], [In:] Prawa człowieka [Human Rights]. Model prawny [Legal model], Eds. R. Wieruszewski, Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sudre, F., 2015. Droit européen et international des droits de l’homme, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sudre, F., 1990. La Convention européenne des droits de l’homme, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tortury [Tortures], [in:] Leksykon ochrony praw człowieka. 100 podstawowych pojęć [Lexicon on Protection of the Human Rights. 100 basic terms], eds. M. Balcerzak, S. Sykuna, Warszawa 2010. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.