Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023)

Biblical Studies

Jesus the Healer in the Fourth Gospel: Bringing Life from God

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/wpt.5501  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-08-19

Abstract

Compared to the Synoptic Gospels, in the Fourth Gospel there is a striking absence of stories of Jesus healing. There are no stories of the lame, those with fevers, withered limbs, dropsy, hemorrhages or lepers or those who are deaf, mute or demonized being healed. It has been supposed, then, that healing is feebly represented in the Fourth Gospel. This essay counters that view and seeks to set out the image of Jesus as healer the Fourth Gospel intended to offer. Notably, four of the seven miracle stories and the associated dialogues in this Gospel are related to healing. In his vocabulary John uses the term ‘signs’ for miracles giving the impression that there were more than the representative seven and, in turn, creating the impression that Jesus’ ministry was characterized by performing miracles that were primarily healings. Also, John’s overlapping use of the term ‘work’ for both Jesus’ ministry and for his miracles infuses Jesus’ entire ministry with the notion of the miraculous creative work of God as healer, conveying his life and presence as Saviour. In the stupendous miracle stories Jesus is portrayed as one with unparalleled power. In his healings Jesus is identified as the Messiah who brings life from God, so that in these stories God is most clearly seen as truly incarnate. In all the healing stories the Passion is echoed and adumbrated so that for John’s readers their experience of the presence of Jesus as healer is an experience of resurrection power that brings God’s life to them and the basis for their faith and evangelism.

References

  1. Ashton J., Understanding the Fourth Gospel, Oxford 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett C.Κ., The Gospel According to St. John, Philadelphia 1978. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauckham R., The Audience of the Gospel of John, [w:] R. Bauckham, The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple: Narrative, History, and Theology in the Gospel of John, Grand Rapids 2007, s. 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer W., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Chicago 1957. [Google Scholar]
  5. Belle C. van, The Meaning of σημεία in Jn 20,30–31, „Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. Louvain Journal of Theology and Canon Law” 74 (1998), s. 300–325. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertram G., ergon ktl, [w:] Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 2, eds. G. Kittel, G. Friedrich, transl. G.W. Bromiley, Grand Rapids 1964, s. 635–652. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bligh J., Four Studies in St John, I: The Man Born Blind, „Heythrop Journal” 7/2 (1966), s. 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bultmann R., Theology of the New Testament, t. 2, London 1951–1955. [Google Scholar]
  9. Burkett D., Two Accounts of Lazarus’ Resurrection in John 11, „Novum Testamentum” 36/3 (1994), s. 209–232. [Google Scholar]
  10. Byrne B., Lazarus: A Contemporary Reading of John 11:1-46, serie: Zacchaeus Studies: New Testament, Collegeville MN 1991. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chibici-Revneanu N., Königlicher Glaube: der basilikos in Joh 4,46-54 als Paradigma eines nachösterlichen Jüngers, „Biblische Notizen” 136 (2008), s. 85–104. [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpepper Alan R., Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design, Philadelphia 1983. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dodd C.H., Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel, Cambridge 1963. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dodd C.H., The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel, Cambridge 1953. [Google Scholar]
  15. Formesyn R., Le Sèmeion johannique et le Sèmeion hellénistique, „Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. Louvain Journal of Theology and Canon Law” 38 (1962), s. 861–894. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fortna R.T., Source and Redaction in the Fourth Gospel’s Portrayal of Jesus’ Signs, „Journal of Biblical Literature” 89/2 (1970), s. 151–166. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fortna R.T., The Fourth Gospel and Its Predecessor, Philadelphia 1988. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fortna R.T., The Gospel of Signs: A Reconstruction of the Narrative Source Underlying the Fourth Gospel, serie: Society for New Testament Studies 11, Cambridge 1970. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grundmann W., dynamai / dynamis, [w:] Theologischer Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, vol. 2, ed. G. Kittel, Stuttgart 1960), s. 284–317. [Google Scholar]
  20. Haenchen E., John 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of John, Chapters 7-21, serie: Hermeneia, Philadelphia 1984. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofius O., Die Auferweckung des Lazarus: Joh 11,1-44 als Zeugnis narrativer Christologie, „Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche” 102/1 (2005), s. 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  22. Käsemann E., The Testament of Jesus: A Study of the Gospel of John in the Light of Chapter 17, serie: The New Testament Library, London 1968. [Google Scholar]
  23. Keener C.S., The Gospel of John: A Commentary, Peabody MA 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Koester C.R., Hearing, Seeing, and Believing in the Gospel of John, „Biblica” 70/3 (1989), s. 327–348. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koester C.R., Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel: Meaning, Mystery, Community, Minneapolis 2003. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lightfoot R.H., St. John’s Gospel: A Commentary, Oxford 1956. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lincoln A.T., The Gospel According to Saint John, serie: Black’s New Testament Commentaries, London–New York 2005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindars B., Rebuking the Spirit: A New Analysis of the Lazarus Story of John 11, „New Testament Studies” 38/1 (1992), s. 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lindars B., The Gospel of John, serie: New Century Bible Commentary, London 1972. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lindars B., Traditions behind the Fourth Gospel, [w:] L’Évangile de Jean: Sources, rédaction, théologie, ed. M. de Jongc, serie: Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 44, Gembloux 1977, s. 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  31. Martyn Louis J., History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel, serie: New Testament Library Series, Louisville KY 2003. [Google Scholar]
  32. Metzger B.M., A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Stuttgart 1994. [Google Scholar]
  33. Moloney F.J., Belief in the Word: Reading the Fourth Gospel: Jan 1-4, Minneapolis 1993. [Google Scholar]
  34. Neirynck F., John and the Synoptics, [w:] L’Évangile de Jean: Sources, rédaction, théologie, ed. M. de Jongc, serie: Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 44, Leuven 1987, s. 73–106. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pilch J.J., Healing in the New Testament: Insights from Medical and Mediterranean Anthropology, Minneapolis 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Reinmuth E., Lazarus and his Sisters – What was John’s Point?, „Review of Theological Literature” 11 (1999), s. 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rengstorf K.H., σημεΐον, [w:] Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 7, eds. G. Kittel, G. Friedrich, transl. G.W. Bromiley, Grand Rapids 1971, s. 200–269. [Google Scholar]
  38. Roose H., Joh 20,30f.: Ein (un)passender Schluss? Joh 9 und 11 als primäre Verweisstellen der Schlussnotiz des Johannesevangeliums, „Biblica” 84 (2003), s. 326–343. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schäfer P., Jesus in the Talmud, Princeton 2007. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schnackenburg R., Zur Traditionsgeschichte von Joh 4:46-54, „Biblische Zeitschrift” 8 (1964), s. 58–88. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schnelle U., Antidocetic Christology in the Gospel of John: An investigation of the place of the fourth Gospel in the Johannine school, Minneapolis 1992. [Google Scholar]
  42. Twelftree G.H., In the Name of Jesus: Exorcism Among Early Christians, Grand Rapids 2007. [Google Scholar]
  43. Twelftree G.H., Jesus the Healer in the Fourth Gospel: Bringing Life from God, [w:] Portraits of Jesus in the Gospel of John: A Christological Spectrum, ed. C.R. Koester, London 2019, s. 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  44. Twelftree G.H., Signs, Wonders, Miracles, [w:] Dictionary of Paul and His Letters: A Compendium of Contemporary Biblical Scholarship, serie: The IVP Bible Dictionary Series, eds. G.F. Hawthorne, R.P. Martin, D.G. Reid, Downers Grove IL 1993, s. 875. [Google Scholar]
  45. Verme Del M., La città di Gerusalemme come polo soteriologico: religioni di salvezza a Bēthzathá/Bēthesdá (Gv 5,1-9), „Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni” 75/1 (2009), s. 145–198. [Google Scholar]
  46. Whittaker M., „Signs and Wonders”: The Pagan Background, „Studia Evangelica” 5 (1968), s. 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  47. Witkamp L.T., The Use of Traditions in John 5.1-18, „Journal for the Study of the New Testament” 8/25 (1985), s. 19–47. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.