Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020)

Articles

Psychological and Legal Aspects of Using Loot Boxes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2020.13.2-29  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2020-12-31

Abstract

The article aims to present the issues related to the new phenomenon of loot boxes in virtual games. The work consists of four parts. The first one defines what loot boxes are and what is their meaning in virtual games. The second part presents psychological issues related to this matter – mainly in the context of similarities between the use of loot boxes and gambling games. The third part of the article explains how the use of loot boxes is regulated in Polish law and in the law of selected European countries. The last part of the study presents arguments why it is worth undertaking interdisciplinary research on the use of loot boxes.

References

  1. Armstrong, Tess, Matthew Rockloff, and Matthew Browne. 2020. “Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking‑Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs.” Journal of Gambling Studies 36:183–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09927-z [Google Scholar]
  2. Dahm, Theresa, Hamid T. Neshat–Doost, Ann–Marie Golden, et al. 2011. “Age shall not weary us: Deleterious effects of self-regulation depletion are specific to younger adults.” PloS one 6, no. 10:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026351 [Google Scholar]
  3. Drummond, Aaron, James D. Sauer, Lauren Hall, et al. 2020. “Why loot boxes could be regulated as gambling.” Nature Human Behaviour 4:986–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0900-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Drummond, Aaron, and James D. Sauer. 2018. “Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling.” Nature Human Behavior 2:530–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0360-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Griffiths, Marc D. 2018. “Is the buying of loot boxes in video games a form of gambling or gaming?” Gaming Law Review: Regulation, Compliance, and Policy 22, no. 1:52–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2018.2216 [Google Scholar]
  6. King, Daniel L., and Paul H. Delfabbro. 2018. “Video game monetization (e.g., ‘loot boxes’): a blueprint for practical social responsibility measures.” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 17:166–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0009-3 [Google Scholar]
  7. King, Daniel L., and Paul H. Delfabbro. 2020. “The convergence of gambling and monetised gaming activities.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 31:32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lelonek–Kuleta, Bernadeta, Iwona Niewiadomska, Rafał Bartczuk, et al. 2019. Raport końcowy z realizacji projektu badawczego „e-Games: gry hazardowe i P2W, dane epidemiologiczne, analiza ryzyka uzależnienia, profile graczy. Badania wielonarodowe”. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lobel, Adam, Rutger C. Engels, Lisanne L. Stone, et al. 2017. “Video gaming and children’s psychosocial wellbeing: A longitudinal study.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 46:884–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0646-z [Google Scholar]
  10. Nielsen, Rune K.L., and Paweł Grabarczyk. 2019. “Are Loot Boxes Gambling? Random Reward Mechanisms in Video Games.” Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 4, no. 3:171–207. https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v4i3.104 [Google Scholar]
  11. Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “Probability neglect: emotions, worst cases, and law.” The Yale Law Journal. 112:61–107. [Google Scholar]
  12. Toto, Serkan. 2012. “Kompu Gacha” social game mechanic is history, here’s how it all went down [social games]. https://www.serkantoto.com/2012/05/09/kompu-gacha-dena-gree-history/ [accessed: 20.11.2020]. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xiao, Leon Y. 2019. “A Primer on the Legal Regulation of Loot Boxes: History, Business, Psychology, Law and Regulation.” (preprint). https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/4vpd6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Zendle, David, and Paul Cairns. 2019. “Loot boxes are again linked to problem gambling: Results of a replication study.” PLoS ONE 14, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213194 [Google Scholar]
  15. Zendle, David, Rachel Meyer, Paul Cairns, et al. 2020. “The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games.” Addiction 115, no. 9:1768-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14973 [Google Scholar]
  16. Zendle, David, Rachel Meyer, and Harriet Over. 2019. “Adolescents and loot boxes: links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase.” Royal Society Open Science 6, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190049 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.