The article examines the significance of legal interpretation in the process of creating and applying canon law. The author argues that although a law does not require explicit approval from its recipients, it fulfils its purpose only when it is observed, which highlights the social dimension of legal interpretation. The study discusses the main types of interpretation – authentic, declarative, and doctrinal – and outlines their functioning according to the norms of the Code of Canon Law. The article further analyses the criteria for correct legal interpretation, including grammatical, logical, analogical, and teleological methods, as well as the importance of ratio legis for understanding a legal norm. Special attention is given to the issue of legal gaps (can. 19) and the ways they may be addressed both by authorities applying the law and by canon law scholarship. The author emphasizes that proper interpretation not only facilitates the application of law but also promotes its acceptance and strengthens the law’s role in building ecclesial community.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.