Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. specjalny (2023)

Articles

Russian–Polish interlingual homonymy within the system of content words (substantive parallels)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/2391-5137.NS23_kkru  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-12-11

Abstract

Homonymy, as a universal linguistic phenomenon, is not confined to the system of a single language; when it crosses its boundaries, it becomes an interlingual phenomenon. The article examines the word-formation properties of Russian–Polish homonymous pairs. The types of homonyms discussed display specific modes of realization, shaped by the semantic functioning of the respective lexical items in each language. The analysis demonstrates that interlingual homonyms originating from a common etymon particularly clearly highlight the national characteristics of both the external and internal (semantic) structure of lexemes in related languages.

References

  1. Babaytseva V.V. (1991), Mesto perehodnyhâvlenij v sisteme âzyka (na materiale častej reči), [v:] Perehodnostʹ i sinkretizm v âzyke i reči: Mežvuzovskij sbornik naučnyh trudov, Moskva, s. 25–88. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bednaž M.A. (2002), Polʹsko-ukraïnsʹka mìžmovna omonìmìâ, Opole. [Google Scholar]
  3. Čeremisina N.V. (1992), Semantikavo zmožnyh mirov i leksiko-semantičeskie zakony, „Naučnye doklady vysšejškoly. Filologičeskie nauki“, № 2, s. 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fedorčuk E.V. (2000), Tipy mežʺâzykovyh leksičeskih omonimov (na materiale russkogo i ukrainskogo âzykov), [v:] Tezisy dokladov 50-j naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii prepodavatelej istudentov. V 2 č. Č. 1, Blagoveŝensk. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fedorčuk E.V. (2001), Mežʺâzykovye omonimy i paronimy v blizkorodstvennyh âzykah (na materiale russkogo i ukrainskogo âzykov), Avtoreferat dis. … kand. filol. nauk, Moskva. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fomina M.I. (1990), Sovremennyj russkij âzyk. Leksikologiâ, Moskva. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kusal K. (2002), Rosyjsko-polski słownik homonimów międzyjęzykowych, Wrocław. [Google Scholar]
  8. Novikova N.S., Čeremisinan.V. (2000), Kartiny mira i mnogomirie v âzyke i poètičeskom tekste, „Russkaâslovesnostʹ“, № 1, s. 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rovdo I.S. (1980), Mežʺâzykovaâ omonimiâ v usloviâh russko-belorusskogo i belorussko-russkogo bilingvizma, Avtoreferat dis. … kand. filol. nauk, Minsk. [Google Scholar]
  10. Širokova A.G. (1978), Teoretičeskie predposylki sopostavitelʹnogo i zučeniâ slavânskih âzykov, „Vestnikmoskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 9: Filologiâ“, № 6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zalevskaâ A.A. (1979), Mežʺâzykovoeso postavlenie v psiholingvistike, Kalinin. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zalevskaâ A.A. (1990), Slovo vleksikone čeloveka: psihologičeskoe issledovanie, Voronež. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zaslavskaâ N.V. (1985), Semantiko-stilističeskaâ i funkcionalʹnaâ harakteristika mežʺâzykovyh omonimov vrusskom i ukrainskom âzykah, Avtoreferat dis. … kand. filol. nauk, Kiev. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.