Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Online First

Articles

How do Ideological and Cultural Perspectives Influence Perceptions of Power Legitimacy? an Empirical Inquiry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9163  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

This paper investigates the evolution of the concept of power legitimacy, focusing on the interplay between political, sociological, and legal perspectives. It highlights the distinctive contributions of Polish scholarly interpretations to the broader global academic dialogue, offering unique empirical insights. Through an empirical analysis conducted via a questionnaire among a diverse participant pool, the study probes the ideological aspects of power legitimacy. This approach integrates modern viewpoints with established theoretical frameworks, enriching our understanding of the complex nature of legitimacy. The objective is to deepen insights and foster scholarly discussion on how ideology, law, and societal acceptance converge to define legitimate power, thereby making a significant empirical contribution to the field.

References

  1. Apodaka, Eduardo, and Mikel Villarreal. 2006. “Conceptions of Power and Paradigms of Legitimacy.” International Society of Political Psychology 29th Annual Scientific Meeting, Barcelona. https://www.academia.edu/1580624/Conceptions_of_power_and_paradigms_of_legitimacy [accessed: 20.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beetham, David. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  3. Belhaj, Abdessamad, and Bianka Speidl. 2017. “Legitimacy and Exchange: The Moral Economy of Authority Among Hungarian Muslims.” https://www.academia.edu/66402419/The_Conceptual_Framework_II_The_notion_of_legitimacy [accessed: 20.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Biernat, Tadeusz. 2000. Legitymizacja władzy politycznej. Elementy teorii. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Razones prácticas. Sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona: Anagrama. https://sociologiac.net/biblio/Bourdieu_RazonesPracticas.pdf [accessed: 20.02.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bukovansky, Mlada. 2009. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coicaud, Jean-Mark. 2002. Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Christoforos, Ioannidis. 2019. Legitimacy: An Essentially Contested Concept. PhD Thesis. https://www.academia.edu/92133830/Legitimacy_an_essentially_contested_concept [accessed: 10.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  9. d’Aspremont, Jean. 2005. “Legitimacy of Governments in the Age of Democracy.” In The Global Fellows Forum, organized by The Hauser Global Law School Program, 877-916. New York: New York University. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipset, Seymour M. 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books. [Google Scholar]
  11. Merelman, Richard M. 1966. “Learning and Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 60, no. 3:548-61. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Merelman,+Richard+M.,+%E2%80%9CLearning+and+Legitimacy,%E2%80%9D+American+Political+Science+Review,+09+1966+(Vol.+60,+No.+3),+pp.+548%E2%80%93561#d=gs_cit&t=1708619155046&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3Agx5xNqxCfi4J%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3Dpl [accessed: 10.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peter, Frank. 2006. “Leading the Community of the Middle Way: A Study of the Muslim Field in France.” The Muslim World 96, no. 4:707-36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2006.00154.x [accessed: 01.09.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pitkin, Hanna F. 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://archive.org/details/wittgensteinjust00hann/page/n5/mode/2up [accessed: 01.09.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rapkin, David P., and Dan Braaten. 2009. “Conceptualising Hegemonic Legitimacy.” Review of International Studies 35, no. 1:113-49. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Conceptualising-hegemonic-legitimacy-Rapkin-Braaten/da3a183f1cfc50e1290e28d-45af88a4477fb9458 [accessed: 20.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Saint Augustine. 1994. The City of God. Translated by Marcus Dods, with an introduction by Thomas Merton. New York: Modern Library. https://archive.org/details/cityofgod0000augu_w6d9/page/n7/mode/2up [accessed: 25.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schaar, John H. 1969. “Legitimacy in the Modern State.” In Power and Community, edited by Paul Green and Sanford Levinson, 276-327. New York: Random House. [Google Scholar]
  17. Suchman, Mark C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3:571-610. [Google Scholar]
  18. Thakur, Ramesh. 2010. “Law, Legitimacy and the United Nations.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 11. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1686273/Thakur.pdf [accessed: 20.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Translated and edited by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/frommaxweberessa00webe/page/n15/mode/1up?ref=ol [accessed: 22.08.2024]. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.