Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Teka Commission of Legal Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Branch in Lublin

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)

Articles

The Evolution of the Legal System of Protecting the Rights and Interests of the United States. The Attorney General Office

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tekapr.2018.11.2-25  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2018-12-31

Abstract

The subject of this studies is to show the development of the legal institution of protection of the rights and interests of the United States. The institution of the United States Attorney (Attorney General) is derived from a similar solution previously found in England. However, the historical analysis shows that despite the common origin, the Attorney General in the United States has its own history. The aim of the study, and at the same time the research hypothesis, is to show the respect of American politics to the stability of solutions and evolutionary changes, sometimes lasting decades. As a result, a system was created that focuses on the Justice Department, headed by Attorney General. It is the largest law firm in the world, very structurally developed, which protects the rights and interests of the United States extremely effectively

References

  1. Bury, Paweł. „Bezpośredni wybór i odwoływanie prokuratorów na przykładzie Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki.” W http://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/Content/79462/03_01_P_Bury_Bezposredni_wybor_i_odwolywanie_prokuratorow.pdf [dostęp: 30.09.2018]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards, John L.J. 1984. The Attorney General, politics, and the public interest. Carswell: Legal Pubns. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilliéron, Gwladys. 2014. Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe. A Comparative Analysis with Special Focus on Switzerland, France, and Germany. Cham–Heidelberg–Nowy Jork–Dordrecht–Londyn: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffin, Bell B. 1978. “The Attorney General: The Federal Government’s Chief Lawyer and Chief Litigator, or One Among Many?.” Fordham Law Review 46(6):1049–1070. [Google Scholar]
  5. Laboulaye, Edward. 1877. Historya Stanów Zjednoczonych. T. III: Organizowanie Państwa i Konstytucja (1776-1789). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Michała Glücksberga. [Google Scholar]
  6. Laidler, Paweł. 2004. Urząd Prokuratora Generalnego Stanów Zjednoczonych. Konflikt kompetencji. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. [Google Scholar]
  7. Langeluttig, Albert. 1927. The Department of Justice of the United States. Baltimore–Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Learned, Henry B. 1909. “The Attorney-General and the Cabinet.” Political Science Quarterly 24(3):444–467. [Google Scholar]
  9. Licak, Tomasz. 2014. ,,Nadużycia prokuratorów w Ameryce.” Ius et Administratio 4:17–40. W https://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/bitstream/handle/item/843/Licak%20T.-Naduzycia%20%20fin.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp: 19.10.2018]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Licak, Tomasz. 2016. „Rewanżyzm prokuratorski w USA.” Państwo Prawne 1(6):192–208. [Google Scholar]
  11. Meador, Daniel J. 1980. The President, the Attorney General, and the Department of Justice. Charlottesville: White Burkett Miller Center of Public Affairs. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nowak, Kazimierz. 1969. „Aparat biurokratyczny w Stanach Zjednoczonych.” Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne. Nauki polityczne 36:61–76. [Google Scholar]
  13. Powell, Jefferson. 1999. The Constitution and the Attorneys General. Harvard: Carolina Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tokarczyk, Roman. 2011. Prawo amerykańskie. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.