Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. 2/19 (2023)

Articles

Linguistic mechanisms as a source of humour in selected verbal jokes: : The analysis of stylistic figures and pragmatic mechanisms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.6865  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-12-18

Abstract

The following article seeks to analyze some linguistic mechanisms which occur in selected English verbal, or linguistic jokes. The focus of the research is concentrated on selected stylistic figures and pragmatic mechanisms that contribute to the creation of humorous contexts. The study is based on a corpus of miscellaneous linguistic jokes. The linguistic mechanisms that contribute to the funniness of the analyzed jokes will be analyzed from the pragmatic and rhetorical points of view. Pragmatically, we will seek examples based on entailments, presuppositions, violation of the maxims, implicatures. Stylistically, or rhetorically, our analysis will pertain to the occurrences of various stylistic devices, such as hyperbole, allusion, alliteration, euphemism, phraseology, irony, colloquial expressions, anaphora, cataphora, simile, puns, metaphor, metonymy. We will seek to determine which pragmatic mechanisms and which rhetorical devices are the most frequent in the jokes.

References

  1. Attardo S. (1994), Linguistic theories of Humor, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brzozowska D. (2000), O dowcipach polskich i angielskich, Opole. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grice H.P. (1975), Logic and Conversation, [in:] P. Cole, J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, New York. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jay T. (1999), Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech, Philadelphia–Amsterdam, http://www.stanford.edu/class/linguist1/Rdgs/jay00.pdf [accessed: 13.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  5. McLoughlin D. (1997), Humour in a second language – the problems for advanced learners, http://jomynard.tripod.com/d_mphil.html [accessed: 13.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raskin V. (1985), Semantic mechanisms of humor, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rod A.M. (2007), The Psychology of Humour: An Intergrative Approach, Amsterdam–Boston–Heidelberg–London–New York–Oxford–Paris–San Diego–San Francisco–Singapore– Sidney–Tokyo. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson N. (2012), Swearing and linguistic impoliteness in social interaction, http://neon. niederlandistik.fu-berlin.de/ss19/paper/309 [accessed: 13.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yule G. (1996), The study of language, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.