Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. 15 (2021)

Articles

Thematic structure of the discourse of intolerance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/2391-5137.15/2021_06ev  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2022-01-17

Abstract

The article presents a model of the thematic structure of hate speech as a form of intolerant discourse on vulnerable social groups singled out on the basis of protected characteristics. Four major thematic categories are identified: “Intuitive assessment”, “Characterization of the social group”, “Comparison of the group with other social groups” and “Position of the group in the discourse community”. Examples of verbalization of topics and subtopics of homophobic, sexist and xenophobic rhetoric in the online comments of Belarusian users in 2015–2019 are provided.

References

  1. Dijk T.A. van (1987), Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk, Newbury Park, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  2. ECRI Annual Report (2020): covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2019, Strasburg, https://rm.coe.int/ecri-annual-report-2019/16809ca3e1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Jhangiani R., Tarry H. (2014), Principles of Social Psychology, Victoria, B.C. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kognitivnaya psikhologiya (2002), V.N. Druzhinin, D.V. Ushakov (red.), Moskva. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kunitsyna V.N., Kazarinova N.V., Pogol’sha V.M. (2001), Mezhlichnostnoye obshcheniye, Sankt-Peterburg. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lakoff R.T. (2000), The language war, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Leary T. (2004), Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation, Eugene. Obshchepoliticheskaya rekomendatsiya № 15 «O bor’be s yazykom nenavisti» (2016): prinyata Evropeyskoy komissiey po bor’be s rasizmom i neterpimost’yu 8 dek. 2015 g., [Google Scholar]
  8. Strasburg, https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech-russ/16808b5b07 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sogomonov A.Yu. (2013), Moral’naya filosofiya i prikladnye etiki (istoki deontologicheskogo konflikta v sovremennom mire), „Vedomosti prikladnoy etiki”, 43, s. 44–54. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tolerantnost’ kak kul’turnaya, politicheskaya, lingvisticheskaya problema (2017), T.V. Roma-nova, A.Yu. Malafeev, N.N. Morozova, M.A. Klimova (Fokina) (red.), Nizhniy Novgorod. [Google Scholar]
  11. UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection (2002): “Membership of a Particular Social group” within the context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, https://www.unhcr.org/publications/legal/3d58de2da/guidelines-international-protection-2-membership-particular-social-group.html [Google Scholar]
  12. Vasilenko E. (2020), Sexist hate speech: Topical organization of intolerant discourse, „Językoznawstwo”, 14, s. 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vasilenko E. (2020a), Ksenofobskaya ritorika: tematicheskaya organizatsiya intolerantnogo diskursa, Fіlologіchnі studії: Naukoviy vіsnik Krivorіz’kogo derzhavnogo pedagogіchnogo unіversitetu, 21, s. 123–132. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vasilenko E.N. (2019), Kommentariy v zhanrovom prostranstve internet-diskursa, Vestnik Minskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, Seriya 1, „Filologiya”, 3 (100), s. 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vasilenko E.N. (2020b), Yazykovaya igra kak sposob verbalizatsii genderno obuslovlennoy vrazhdebnosti, Vestnik Minskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, Seriya 1, „Filologiya”, 3 (106), s. 7–12. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)