Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. 3/24 (2025)

Articles

The influence of proofreading on message clarity in academic WhatsApp communication: A case study of the College of Business Education, Tanzania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.9777  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2025-10-07

Abstract

This study examines how proofreading behaviours affect clarity in communicating and interpreting messages in higher learning WhatsApp groups, focusing on the CBE-ALL-STAFF group at the Dar es Salaam campus. Using a qualitative case study with 60 academic and non-academic staff of diverse ages, professions, and digital skills, data were gathered through interviews, focus group discussions, and analysis of 100 authentic WhatsApp messages. NVivo 12 coding revealed five themes: professional image, misinterpretation, context-dependent conduct, emotional effects, and time inefficiencies. Findings show strict proofreading in formal contexts, especially among academics, while informal settings allow more flexibility. Omissions often led to confusion, reputational harm, and redundant follow-ups. The study highlights proofreading as vital for clarity and professionalism in academic digital communication and suggests that institutions enhance norms through literacy programs and context-sensitive training.

References

  1. Barbour R. (2018), Doing focus groups, Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blumer H. (1969), Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology, “Qualitative Research in Psychology”, vol. 3(2), pp. 77–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. (2011), Research methods in education (7th ed.), London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  5. Creswell J.W., Poth C.N. (2018), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  6. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H. (1986), Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, “Management Science”, vol. 32(5), pp. 554–571. [Google Scholar]
  7. Drouin M., Davis C. (2009), R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?, “Journal of Literacy Research”, vol. 41(1), pp. 46–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802695131 [Google Scholar]
  8. García-Peñalvo F.J., Conde M.Á. (2015), The impact of a mobile personal learning environment in different educational contexts, “Universal Access in the Information Society”, vol. 14(3), pp. 375–387. [Google Scholar]
  9. Geisler C. (2004), Analyzing streams of language: Twelve steps to the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data, London: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  10. Giles H., Ogay T. (2007), Communication accommodation theory, [in:] B.B. Whaley, W. Samter (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman E. (1959), The presentation of self in everyday life, New York: Anchor Books. [Google Scholar]
  12. Junco R., Cotten S.R. (2011), Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use, “Computers and Education”, vol. 56(2), pp. 370–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  13. Krippendorff K. (2018), Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  14. Marin L. (2022), Enactive principles for the ethics of user interactions on social media: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making, “Topoi”, vol. 41(2), pp. 425–437, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09792-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Merriam S.B., Tisdell E.J. (2016), Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  16. Miyake K. (2020), Evolution of emoji and beyond: A diachronic observation of visual representations in Japanese mobile media, “Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences”, vol. 22, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mlundi S. (2024), Effectiveness of editing and proofreading skills in improving academic writing of law students, “Anatolian Journal of Education”, vol. 9(2), pp. 159–170, https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2024.9213a [Google Scholar]
  18. Moses K.B. (2014), Mobile communication evolution, “International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science”, vol. 6(1), pp. 25–33, https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2014.01.03 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mtega W.P., Malekani A.W. (2016), Analyzing the usage of mobile communication among university staff in Tanzania, “Information Development”, vol. 32(3), pp. 646–656. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nobles S., Paganucci L. (2015), Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments, “Computers and Composition”, vol. 38, pp.16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Patton M.Q. (2015), Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosmi, Syamsir (2021), The effect of integrity and professionalism on employee performance in digital era, [in:] Proceedings of the TIC 2020 – 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference, Magelang: EAI, https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-10-2020.2311846 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schnurr S. (2024), Exploring professional communication: Language in action (2nd ed.), London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003379614 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sibarani C. V., Marbun W., Hartati R. (2024), Feedback and literacy: Investigating the mediating role of ambiguity in texting communication, Fonologi: “Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris”, vol. 2(4), pp. 184–200, https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1230 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sujinpram N., Wannaruk A. (2024), Enhancing business email writing ability through the integration of genre-based approach and data-driven learning, “International Journal of Instruction”, vol. 17(3), pp. 255–274, https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17314a [Google Scholar]
  26. Tagg C. (2015), Exploring digital communication: Language in action, Abingdon: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  27. Thurlow C., Brown A. (2003), The language of texting: SMS and sociolects, “Discourse & Society”, vol. 14(1), pp. 123–145. [Google Scholar]
  28. Turner J. (2011), Rewriting writing in higher education: the contested spaces of proofreading, “Studies in Higher Education”, vol. 36(4), pp. 427–440, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003671786 [Google Scholar]
  29. Yin R.K. (2014), Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  30. Verheijen L. (2013), The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy, “English Studies”, vol. 94(5), pp. 582–602, https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2013.795737 [Google Scholar]
  31. Xenakis I., Gavalas D., Kasapakis V., Dzardanova, E., Vosinakis S. (2022), Non-verbal communication in immersive virtual reality through the lens of presence: a critical review, “Presence: Virtual and Augmented Reality”, vol. 31, pp. 147–187. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.