Перейти к главному меню навигации Перейти к основному контенту Перейти к нижнему колонтитулу сайта
Językoznawstwo baner

№ 3/24 (2025)

Artykuły

Sign and meaning: from Plato and de Saussure to Derrida and Deleuze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.9819  [Google Scholar]
Опубликован: 2025-10-07

Аннотация

The article concerns the problematic of sign and meaning. It starts with Plato’s explanation, which was to give rise to the tradition of Western metaphysics based on the dualistic divisions of logocentrism. De Saussure inaugurated the deconstruction of this approach based on the division of sign into signifier and signified, thus initiating linguistics. The most interesting versions of this problem are those of postmodernists, Derrida and Deleuze. The latter’s proposition is crucial because it is constitutive not only of meaning creation but also of the whole process of subjective becoming, of which meaningful creation is the most important part. The article is aimed at the presentation of this transformation: from Platonian representation to the power of affective intensities, where the life of the subject depends not only on reason and the rational correspondence to the idea, but above all on the sensitivity of its internal absorption, creatively developed by its encounters.

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Barker J. (2016), Love, Language and the Dramatization of Ethical Worlds in Deleuze, “Deleuze Studies”, vol. 10(1), pp. 100–116. [Google Scholar]
  2. Calo S. (2021), Semio-Pragmatics as Politics: On Guattari and Deleuze’s Theory of Language, “Deleuze and Guattari Studies”, vol. 15(2), pp. 266–284. [Google Scholar]
  3. Deleuze G. (2010), Difference and Repetition, London, New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  4. Deleuze G. (1968), Spinoza et le problème de l’expression, Paris: Minuit. [Google Scholar]
  5. Deleuze G. (1988), Spinoza. Practical Philosophy, San Francisco: City Lights Books. [Google Scholar]
  6. Deleuze G. (2014), Spinoza: filozofia praktyczna, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo naukowe. [Google Scholar]
  7. Derrida J. (2009), Writing and Difference, London and New York: Routledge Classics. [Google Scholar]
  8. Derrida J. (2010), Dissemination, New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  9. de Saussure F. (1959), Course in General Linguistics, New York: Philosophical Library. [Google Scholar]
  10. Foley W.A. (2009), Anthropological Linguistics. An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gadamer H.-G. (2004), Truth and Method, London, New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kłos-Czerwińska P. (2012), Próba lingwistycznej i antropologicznej analizy społecznych tożsamości w praktykach pisarskich logocentryzmu i dekonstrukcji, Wrocław: unpublished materials. [Google Scholar]
  13. Maturana H., Varela F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston: New Science Library. [Google Scholar]
  14. Merleau-Ponty M. (1964), An Unpublished Text, [in:] J.M. Edie (ed.), The Primacy of Perception, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Minsky M. (1986), The Society of Mind, New York: Simon and Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  16. Plato (2008), Cratylus, Phaedrus, Phaedo, Republic, The Seventh Letter, [in:] Plato: Middle Dialogues, London: Forgotten Books. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanders C. (2006), The Cambridge Companion to Saussure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. von Uexküll J. (2010), A Foray Into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning, Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.