The article examines the question of the representability of God in Eastern Orthodoxy through the lenses of Byzantine iconoclasm, the iconodulic theology of the Second Council of Nicaea, and the Old Believer hermeneutics of the sacred image. It argues that the controversy over icons is not an aesthetic dispute but a theological and ecclesiological one, rooted in the tension between biblical apophaticism and the Christological visibility granted by the Incarnation. Drawing on the Acts of Nicaea II, the study outlines an ontological conception of the image grounded in the relationship between the hypostasis of Christ and its visible representation. This is contrasted with the Old Believer genealogy of form, in which the truth of the icon derives not from its relation to the prototype but from fidelity to ancestral tradition. The article also explores the contemporary reception of Orthodox icon theology, showing that modern hermeneutics of the image develop within the tension between the dogma of the Incarnation and the historical memory of form. The conclusion highlights the dynamic character of Orthodox image-theology, wherein ontology, liturgy, and tradition converge, and asserts that the limits of divine representability arise not from artistic constraints but from the mystery of the Incarnation.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.