Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 10 (2016)

Articles

Hunting for a missing link: between cognitive framework and classroom practices

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/2391-5137.10/2016_13-26  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2017-03-16

Abstract

The problem discussed in this article is the result of a conference on research on the importance of cognitive linguistics for teaching / learning foreign languages. Despite the high methodological standards, the introduction of cognitive grammar in the classroom showed a "missing link" between concepts and reality. In the article, the author describes exercises that should help students discover the correlation between language and somatic experience. The workshop consists of two stages: (i) introduction to the concept of image patterns as conceptual structures of our organization of cognitive function; (II) sample analysis of patterns of image organizing the semantic structure of the chosen language expressions.

References

  1. Bielak J., Applying Cognitive Grammar in the classroom: Teaching English possessives, [in:] M. Pawlak (ed.), Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts. Exploring Focus on Form in Language Teaching, Poznań–Kalisz 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bielak J., Pawlak M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak A., Teaching the English active and passive voice with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study, “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, Kalisz 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellis R., Instructed Second Language Acquisition, Oxford 1990. Evans V., Green M., Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh 2006. Foley M., Hall D., Longmans Advanced Learner’s Grammar, Pearson Education Limited, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson M., The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason, Chicago 1987. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kermer F., A Cognitive Grammar Approach to the Instruction of English Tense and Aspect in the L2 Context, Joensuu 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metaphors We Live By, Chicago 1980. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lakoff G., Kobiety, ogień i rzeczy niebezpieczne. Co kategorie mówią nam o umyśle, Kraków 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Langacker R. W., Cognitive Grammar: a Basic Introduction, Oxford 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandler J. M., Canovas P. C., On defining image schemas, “Language and Cognition” 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pawlak M., Droździał-Szelest K., When I think about grammar… Exploring English Department students’ beliefs about grammar, grammar learning and grammar teaching, [in:] M. Pawlak (ed.), Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts. Exploring Focus on Form in Language Teaching, Poznań–Kalisz 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pawlak, Mirosław (ed.), Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts. Exploring Focus on Form in Language Teaching, Poznań–Kalisz 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dictionaries and Internet sources [Google Scholar]
  13. Doroszewski W. (ed.), Słownik poprawnej polszczyzny PWN [The dictionary of correct Polish PWN], Warszawa 1981. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillard P. (ed.), Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary, Cambridge 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miodek J., Słownik ojczyzny polszczyzny [The dictionary of Polish as a Home Country], Wrocław 2002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mish F. C. (ed.), Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam-Webster Inc., 1990. http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2013/02/grammar [accessed 30 04 2016]. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/reflexivity [accessed 30 04 2016]. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.