Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. 1/20 (2024)

Articles

“How Dirty Boys Get Clean” – on sexual objectification of women in advertising before and after #metoo era

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.8476  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2024-05-29

Abstract

The portrayal of women in the advertising industry has been a topic of ongoing debate for over four decades. Advertisers worldwide have been consistently accused of perpetuating inappropriate and degrading stereotypes of women, including their bodies and their perceived roles in a male-dominated society. Although recent years have seen increased public awareness of such harmful practices, with #metoo movement and some prominent brands promoting the concept of women’s empowerment, significant progress towards portraying women in a manner that respects their dignity and avoids reducing them to sexual objects still remains rather elusive.

The primary objective of this paper is to analyse the representation of women in selected printed advertisements from the past two decades of advertising and determine whether there has been any significant shift in recent years. Additionally, the paper seeks to examine the possible implications of sexual objectification in contemporary advertising, with a particular focus on the potential transition from sexual objectification to sexual subjectification.

The primary objective of this paper is to analyse the representation of women in selected printed advertisements from the past two decades of advertising and determine whether there has been any significant shift in recent years. Additionally, the paper seeks to examine the possible implications of sexual objectification in contemporary advertising, with a particular focus on the potential transition from sexual objectification to sexual subjectification.

References

  1. Barry K. (1994), Female Sexual Slavery, New York. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry P. (2008), Advertising Concept Book: Think Now, Design Later, London. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartky S. L. (1990), Feminity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Opression, London. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brewis H. (2019), Air Conditioning Billboard with ‘Your Wife is Hot’ Slogan Sparks Heated Debate. The Standard’s internet publication https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/air-conditioning-billboard-with-your-wife-is-hot-slogan-sparks-heated-debate-a4196091.html [accessed: 02.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll N. (1994), Visual metaphor, [in:] J. Hintikka (ed.), Aspects of metaphor, pp. 189–218. [Google Scholar]
  6. Forceville Ch. (2002), The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors, [in:] “Journal of Pragmatics”, vol. 34, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedrickson B.L., Roberts T.A. (1997), Objectification Theory: Towards Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks, [in:] “Psychology of Women Quarterly”, vol. 21, pp. 173–206. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gill R. (2009), From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Re-sexualization of Women’s Bodies in the Media, Monthly Review’s Internet Publication (http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2009/gill230509.html) [Google Scholar]
  9. Gramazio S., Cadinu M., Guizzo F. (2020), Does Sex Really Sell? Paradoxical Effects of Sexualization in Advertising on Product Attractiveness and Purchase Intentions, [in:] “Sex Roles: A Journal of Research”, vol. 84, pp. 701–719. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammet E. (2020), Beach Bodies, Boobs, Girl Bosses: Have Brands Got to Grips with How to Portray Women in Ads? “Marketing Week’s”, https://www.marketingweek.com/international-womens-day-2020-representation-in-advertising/ [accessed: 04.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hsu T. (2019), #MeToo Clashes With ‘Bro Culture’ at Ad Agencies, “New York Times”, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/22/business/media/ad-industry-sexism.html [accessed: 18.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kovecses Z. (2010), Metaphor. A Practical Introduction, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1990), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  14. Levit M. (2005), Sex in Advertising: Does it sell?, Articles Factory, https://www.articlesfactory.com/articles/advertising/sex-in-advertising-does-it-sell.html#google_vignette [accessed: 18.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Long P.G. (2007), Sex in Advertising: A Closer Look, Articles Factory, https://www.articlesfactory.com/search/long-p.-g.-(2007),-sex-in-advertising:-a-closer-look.html [accessed: 18.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  16. McCoy K. (2022), ‘Gaming is very much here to stay’: Why Axe body spray is taking a bigger swing at esports marketing, Digiday, https://digiday.com/marketing/gaming-is-very-much-here-to-stay-why-axe-body-spray-is-taking-a-bigger-swing-at-esports-marketing/#:~:text [accessed: 10.01.2024]. [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Reilly L. (2015), This ‘fat-shaming’ ad that sparked a protest and was banned in the UK has been brought to America, Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/protein-world-are-you-beach-body-ready-ad-launches-in-new-york-city-2015-6?IR=T [accessed: 19.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pham S., Dong S. (2017), Audi Ad Likening Women to Used Cars in China Backfires, CNN Business, https://money.cnn.com/2017/07/19/news/companies/audi-backlash-ad-china/index.html [accessed: 28.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reichert T. (2008), Does Sex in Advertising Work?, Branding Strategy Insider, http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2008/03/does-sex-in-adv.html [accessed: 08.11.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh N. (2021), ‘Victim-blaming’ advert for make-up wipe withdrawn in China after backlash, Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/purcotton-china-ad-victim-blaming-b1785831.html [accessed: 14.12.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szymanski D.M., Moffit L.B., Carr E.R. (2011), Sexual Objectification of Women: Advances to Theory and Research, [in:] “The Counseling Psychologist”, vol. 39(1), pp. 6–38. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wirtz J.G., Sparks J.V., Zimbres T.M. (2017), The effect of exposure to sexual appeals in advertisements on memory, attitude, and purchase intention: a meta-analytic review, [in:] “International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications”, vol. 37(2), pp. 168–198. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.