Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 128 (2017): Nasza Przeszłość

Articles

The dissolution of the Trinitarian monastery in Krotoszyn and the history of its spiritual legacy

  • Mirosława Sobczyńska-Szczepańska
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52204/np.2017.128.131-153  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2017-12-30

Abstract

The Trinitarian monastery in Krotoszyn shared the fate of other convents of the Greater Poland, which, after the second partition of Poland, found themselves within the borders of the Kingdom of Prussia. As a result of a repressive policy towards the Church, the number of members of the monastic community fell drastically and its state of possession diminished significantly. Both under the Prussian rule and during the existence of the Duchy of Warsaw, by the decision of state authorities, some monastery rooms were confiscated and turned into storerooms and offices. The monastery was closed in 1819, when – after the death of the superior Fr. Jan Szkaradowicz – only one monk remained. An interim priest was appointed for the church, since 1824 it was administered by the parish priest of Krotoszyn and in 1925 the parish of St. Apostles Peter and Paul was established. The monastery building was turned into the seat of the district school in 1836, later a primary and secondary school and since 1881 of army and civil offices. Since 1969 the building has housed the Regional Museum of Krotoszyn. Post-Trinitarian buildings remained unchanged – only a two-storey gallery was demolished (in 1836). The interior design was preserved with the exception of a few effigies of saints, among them the figure of Jesus of Nazareth the Ransomed exposed in the main altar, characteristic for the iconography of the Trinitarian Order. Liturgical equipment was dispersed among the parish church and poor churches from the Archdioceses of Gniezno and Poznan. Some monastery documents and books remaining after the dissolution of the monastery were handed over to the State Archive of the Kingdom of Prussia in Poznan in 1869 and others to the Archdiocesan Archive in Poznan in 1935. The latter ones became lost.

References

  1. W. Dalbor, Związki Wielkopolski i Śląska w architekturze drugiej połowy wieku XVIII, „Prace Komisji Historii Sztuki PAU”, t. 10, 1952. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Janiszewski, Powiat kępiński, Kępno1928. [Google Scholar]
  3. Katalog zabytków sztuki w Polsce, t. 5, Województwo poznańskie, z. 11, Powiat krotoszyński. Red. T. Ruszczyńska, A. Sławska. Oprac. Z. i J. Kębłowscy. Warszawa 1973. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kościół św. Piotra i Pawła (potrynitarski), „Strażnica Kresowa. Miesięcznik Młodzieży Gimnazjum im. Ks. Hugona Kołłątaja”, R. 1, 1931, nr 3, s. 4. [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Krotoski, Dzieje miasta Krotoszyna, t. 1, Miasto Krotoszyn i jego dziedzice za czasów polskich (od 1415 do 1779), Krotoszyn 1930. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Kusza, Dzieje gimnazjum krotoszyńskiego 1836-1946, Krotoszyn-Poznań 2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Nowacki, Dzieje Archidiecezji Poznańskiej, t. 2, Poznań 1964. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Romanowicz, Zarys historii obecnego gimnazjum im. H. Kołłątaja w Krotoszynie (1836-1829), [w:] Sprawozdanie dyrekcji Państwowego Gimnazjum im. Ks[iędza] H[ugona] Kołłątaja w Krotoszynie za pierwsze dziesięciolecie Zakładu w niepodległej i wolnej ojczyźnie 1919-1929, Krotoszyn 1929. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Sobczyńska-Szczepańska, Problem autorstwa kościoła dworskiego w Cieszkowie oraz świątyni trynitarzy w Krotoszynie w świetle źródeł, „Biuletyn Historii Sztuki”, t. 75, 2013, nr 3. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Sobczyńska-Szczepańska, Architektura trynitarzy na ziemiach dawnej Rzeczypospolitej, Katowice 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Wąsicki, Ziemie polskie pod zaborem pruskim. Prusy południowe 1793-1806. Studium historyczno-prawne, Wrocław 1957. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Witko, Sztuka w służbie Zakonu Trójcy Świętej w siedemnastym i osiemnastym stuleciu, Warszawa 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Wojciechowska, Dokumenty i akta klasztorów w Archiwum Państwowym w Poznaniu – dzieje, zawartość i metody opracowania, „Poznański rocznik archiwalno-historyczny”, R. 4, 1996. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.