Перейти к главному меню навигации Перейти к основному контенту Перейти к нижнему колонтитулу сайта

№ 2/23 (2025)

Artykuły

Lexical and grammatical means of communication between text components

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.9630  [Google Scholar]
Опубликован: 2025-06-17

Аннотация

The article discusses the means of communication between the components of the semantic structure of English language text. The structural and semantic features of sentences that make up a complex syntactic whole are especially highlighted. Special attention is paid to the problem of the interrelation of sentences in the compositional and semantic structure of a complex syntactic whole. The semantic connection between the previous context and subsequent sentences of the text is carried out by lexical and grammatical means of communication. Proper use of these means of communication plays an important role in text formation. The text as a whole speech product and its separate units are treated of only through the concept of coherence. Researchers certainly emphasize this feature of the text, focusing on external means of creating coherence. As a rule, linguistic communication signals of sentences sequences are considered within the framework of a single whole. However, the concept of coherence presupposes not only the presence of external signs of the cohesion of sentences, but also the presence of an internal, semantic, deep connection of all the meanings (or most of the meanings) that make up a text fragment. The linguistic approach to the text is aimed at revealing the typical structure of any text in general, its linguistic, structural and compositional formality.

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Abdullaev K.M. (1983), Aktualʹnoe členenie predloženiâ v azerbajdžanskom âzyke, “Sovetskaâ tûrkologiâ”, № 1, s. 61–75. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdullayev Ə.Ə. (1998), Aktual üzvlənmə və mətn, Bakı: Xəzər Universitetinin Nəşriyyatı. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blokh M.Â. (1983), Teoretičeskaâ grammatika angliĭskogo âzyka: Učebnik dlâ studentov filologičeskih fakulʹtetov universitetov i fakulʹtetov angliĭskogo âzyka pedagogičeskih vuzov, Moskva: Vyssaâ škola. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown G. (1977), Listening to Spoken English, London: Longman Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  5. Černâhovskaâ L.A. (1983), Smyslovaâ struktura teksta i ee edinicy, “Voprosy âzykoznaniâ”, № 6, s. 114–123. [Google Scholar]
  6. DBRS Finalizes Provisional Ratings on WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C25 (2014), “Morning Star”, 12 December. [Google Scholar]
  7. Galʹperin I.R. (1977), K probleme zavisimosti predloženija ot konteksta, “Voprosy âzykoznaniâ”, № 1, s. 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  8. Galʹperin I.R. (1981), Tekst kak obʺekt lingvističeskogo issledovaniâ, Moskva: Nauka. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurevič V.V. (2007), Teoretičeskaâ grammatika angliĭskogo âzyka. Sravnitelʹnaâ tipologiâ angliĭskogo i russkogo âzykov: Učebnoe posobie, Moskva: Flinta, Nauka. [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday M.A.K. (1976), Cohesion in English, “English Lang.”, Ser. 9 M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hasan, London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hlebnikova I.B. (1983), K probleme sredstv svâzi meždu predloženijami v tekste (na materiale angliĭskogo âzyka), “Inostrannye âzyki v škole”, № 1, s. 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ilʹiš B.A. (1971), Stroj sovremennogo angliĭskogo âzyka. Učebnik po kursu teoretičeskoĭ grammatiki dlja studentov pedvuzov, Leningrad: Prosveŝenie. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kruchinina L.I. (1982), Osnovnye sredstva kogezii angliĭskogo nauchnogo teksta: Avtoreferat dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. [Author’s abstract of PhD dissertation (Philological Sciences)], Moskva. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuharenko V.A. (1988), Interpretaciâ teksta, Moskva: Prosveŝenie. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lawrence D.H. (1915), England, My England, London: Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lawrence D.H. (1977), The Prussian Officer, London: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikolaeva T.M. (1987), Edinicy teksta i teoriâ teksta, “Issledovaniâ po strukture teksta”, s. 27–57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikolaeva T.M. (2012), O čem rasskazyvajut nam teksty?, Moskva: Âzyki slavânskih kulʹtur. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nozdrina L.A. (1981), Kompoziciâ i grammaticheskie sredstva svâznosti hudožestvennogo teksta: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk., Moskva. [Google Scholar]
  20. Odincov V.V. (1980), Stilistika teksta, Moskva: Nauka. [Google Scholar]
  21. Palmer F.P. (1976), Semantics. A New Outline, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parker G. (1978), The Darkness of the Morning, Moscow: Progress Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  23. Potebnâ A.A. (1958), Iz zapisok po russkoĭ grammatike. T. I–II, Moskva: Učpedgiz. [Google Scholar]
  24. Šahifovič A.M., Gab M.A. (1991), Pragmatika teksta: psiholingvističeskij podhod, [v:] Krasnyh V.V. (otv. red.), Tekst kak ediniца kommunikacii. Sbornik naučnyh trudov, vyp. 371, Moskva: MGLU, s. 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  25. Turaeva Z.Â. (1986), Lingvistika teksta, Moskva: Prosveŝenie. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vinogradov V.V. (1963), Stilistika: Teoriâ poètičeskoĭ reči, Moskva: AN SSSR. [Google Scholar]

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Похожие статьи

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.