Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 93 (2000): Our Past

Miscellanea

Father Mateusz Sowicki, the parish priest-administrator in Niekrasów during the second half of the 18th century

  • Waldemar Kowalski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52204/np.2000.93.379-397  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2000-06-30

Abstract

Father Mateusz Sowicki was a parish priest and farmer in Niekrasów in the second half of the 18th century. The main sources for research on the history of rural parishes in Old Polish times are the documentation created by the diocesan administration, such as post-visit protocols and the ordinary's files. Lists of the faithful and economic documentation were created in parishes, but their scope was limited. In the Niekrasow parish, which was one of the poorest in the Sandomierz archdeaconry, parish documentation was above the norm, but today it is available in a very limited selection. It is worth noting that knowledge about these sources and their actual state of preservation is currently unknown. Father Mateusz Sowicki was the author of a diary written in the years 1768-1788, which is a rare testimony of local everyday life. This diary describes the situation of the parish, which was poor and had a small number of parishioners. Sowicki took care of the parish's property, but the parish still remained poor. The diary lacks information about parishioners and pastoral work, which may be consistent with the approach of the diocesan administration. Father Sowicki may have rarely employed deputies and performed most of his pastoral duties himself. Sowicki continued his notes about the parish over the years, but it is unclear whether they were made on an ongoing basis or over several years. Sowicki's Chronicle is well preserved and is a valuable historical source. The publication of chronicles and diaries of parish clergy is an important requirement for historical research.

References

  1. Bastrzykowski A., Zabytki kościelnego budownictwa drzewnego w diecezji sandomierskiej, Kraków 1930. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dziechcińska H., Pamiętnik w: Słownik literatury staropolskiej, red. T. Michałowska, Wrocław 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. Guidon Z. , Źródła statystyczne do dziejów Pomorza Wschodniego i Kujaw od XVI do początków XX w., Toruń 1970. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kowalski W., Uposażenie parafii, passim; W. Kriegseisen, Ewangelicy polscy i litewscy w epoce saskiej (1696-1763), Warszawa 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. Olczak S., Kancelarie kościelne w okresie staropolskim, „Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne”, t.64: 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/abmk.8583 [Google Scholar]
  6. Robótka H., Archiwistyka, Warszawa 1989. [Google Scholar]
  7. Słowiński J., Rozwój pisma łacińskiego w Polsce XVI-XVIII w. Studium paleograficzne, Lublin 1992.. [Google Scholar]
  8. Szołdrski W. , W sprawie archiwum i kroniki parafialnej, „Kronika Diecezji Sandomierskiej” R. 43: 1950. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ślusarska M., Oświeceniowe modele biskupa, plebana i parafii. Kontynuacja czy zmiana tradycji?, w: Dwór, plebania, rodzina chłopska. Szkice z dziejów wsi polskiej X l j l i XVIII w.,Warszawa 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wiśniewsks.i J., Katalog prałatów i kanoników sandomierskich od 1186—1926 r. tudzież sesje kapituły sandomierskiej od 1581 do 1866 r., Radom 1926. [Google Scholar]
  11. Żabiński Z., Systemy pieniężne na ziemiach polskich.Wrocław 1981. [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>