Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Językoznawstwo baner

No. 2/19 (2023)

Articles

On the need for interdisciplinary research on fake news. Reconnaissance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25312/j.6838  [Google Scholar]
Published: 2023-12-18

Abstract

This article discusses various mechanisms and factors involved in the creation and distribution of fake news, in relation to the characteristics of contemporary media and the phenomena that contribute to the susceptibility of their audiences to disinformation. It also illustrates how easily users can generate fake news with the assistance of artificial intelligence and provides examples of deliberate disinformation campaigns conducted to destabilize and polarize societies. The response to issues related to the proliferation of disinformation and the social harm caused by fake news is reflected in the abundance of research conducted, sometimes across disparate disciplines. Consequently, a comprehensive approach to the phenomenon of fake news necessitates interdisciplinary research and the collaboration of scientists representing diverse fields of study. Through such collaboration, it becomes possible to disseminate knowledge about fake news and methods for verifying information in the form of clear and credible materials that educators can utilize. Indeed, the most effective solution lies in enhancing information awareness, particularly among students in their final years of primary and secondary education.

References

  1. Allcott H., Gentzkow M. (2017), Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election, „Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 31, no. 2, s. 211–236, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  2. Balakrishnan V., Ng W.Z., Soo M.Ch., Han G.J., Lee Ch.J. (2022), Infodemic and fake news – A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: A scoping review, „International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction”, vol. 78, 103144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell R., Mieth L., Buchner A. (2022), Coping with high advertising exposure: A source-monitoring perspective, „Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications”, vol. 7(1), s. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00433-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciesek-Ślizowska B., Wilczek W. (2023), Jude Niedziel, dr Mengele, covidowe hitlerki – językowe środki dyskredytacji przeciwnika w dyskursie sceptycznym wobec szczepień, „Res Rhetorica”, vol. 10(1), s. 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  5. Conroy N., Rubin V., Chen Y. (2015a), Misleading Online Content: Recognizing Clickbait as „False News”, [w:] M. Abouelenien, M. Burzo, R. Mihalcea, V. Pérez-Rosas (red.), WMDD‘15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection, New York, s. 15–19, https://doi.org/10.1145/2823465.2823467 [Google Scholar]
  6. Conroy N., Rubin V., Chen Y. (2015b), Deception detection for news: three types of fakes, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliott V. (2023), It’s Way Too Easy to Get Google’s Bard Chatbot to Lie, https://www.wired.com/story/its-way-too-easy-to-get-googles-bard-chatbot-to-lie/ [dostęp: 14.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flynn J. (2023), 35+ Amazing Advertising Statistics [2023]: Data + Trends, https://www.zippia.com/advice/advertising-statistics/ [dostęp: 13.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kairys A., Jurkuvėnas V., Mikuličiūtė V., Ivleva V., Pakalniškienė V. (2023), Vyresnio amžiaus asmenų patikėjimo tikromisir melagingomis naujienomis ypatumai, „Information & Media”, vol. 97, s. 49–68, https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2023.97.59 [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein D., Wueller J. (2017), Fake News: A legal perspective, „Journal of Internet Law”, vol. 20, no. 10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mika B. (2016), Ekonomia uwagi – gospodarczy fundament społeczeństwa informacyjnego widziany oczami sceptyka, „Przegląd Socjologiczny”, nr LXV(65), cz. 3, s. 111–129. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mustafaraj E., Metaxas P. (2017), The fake news spreading plague: was it preventable?, [w:] P. Fox, D. McGuinness, L. Poirer (red.), WebSci ‘17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, New York, s. 235–239, https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091523 [Google Scholar]
  13. Potthast M., Kiesel J., Reinartz K., Bevendor J., Stein B. (2018), A stylometric inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news, [w:] I. Gurevych, Y. Miyao, Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosińska K. (2021), Disinformation in Poland: Thematic classification based on content analysis of fake news from 2019, „Cyberpsychology”, vol. 15, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-4-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Rożyński P. (2023), Google straciło w jeden dzień ponad 100 mld dol. przez błąd bota, https://cyfrowa.rp.pl/globalne-interesy/art37935371-google-stracilo-w-jeden-dzien-ponad-100-mlddol-przez-blad-bota [dostęp: 14.04.2023]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Skulmowski A., Augustin Y., Pradel S., Nebel S., Schneider S., Rey G.D. (2016), The negative impact of saturation on website trustworthiness and appeal: A temporal model of aesthetic website perception, „Computers in Human Behavior”, vol. 61, s. 386–393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.054 [Google Scholar]
  17. Śledź P. (2021), Ostry cień mgły: antyzachodnia dezinformacja ze strony Chin i Rosji w związku z pandemią COVID-19, „Rocznik Strategiczny 2020/2021”, s. 389–401. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stewart L.G., Arif A., Starbird K. (2018), Examining Trolls and Polarization with a Retweet Network, Marina Del Rey. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vargo Ch., Guo L., Amazeen M. (2018), The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016, „Sage Journals”, vol. 20(5), https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086 [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)